Kintavious Dozier
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1849:29 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 61
- Minutes per game
- 30:19
- Points per game
- 14.1
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.4 / 1.5
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 14.1 | 3.4 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 1.8 | 1.4 |
| Per 40 minutes | 18.6 | 4.5 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 0.2 | 2.3 | 1.9 |
| Season totals | 862 | 208 | 93 | 76 | 7 | 107 | 88 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 282–651 | 43.3% | 10.7 | 14.1 |
| 2P | 205–437 | 46.9% | 7.2 | 9.5 |
| 3P | 77–214 | 36.0% | 3.5 | 4.6 |
| FT | 221–267 | 82.8% | 4.4 | 5.8 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49.2% | 56.1% | 32.9% | 41.0% | 0.87 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Kintavious Dozier | Grambling | 28 | 27:12 | 13.2 | 2.8 | 1.1 | 19.4 | 33.7% | 79.3% | 55.7% |
| 2025 Kintavious Dozier | Grambling | 3Few games | 31:19 | 12.3 | 4.0 | 0.7 | 15.8 | 36.4%† | 93.8%† | 57.7%† |
| 2026 Kintavious Dozier | Alabama A&M | 30 | 33:08 | 15.2 | 3.9 | 2.0 | 18.3 | 37.7% | 84.4% | 56.3% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Alabama A&M · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $16K
- 80% range $1K to $58K
- Median share of team pool
- 13.2%
- team pool $165K, 80% range $64K to $445K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $15K to $16K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $1K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 82.6%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Alabama A&M: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Alabama A&M | $16Kspeculative | $1K to $58K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -1.1 | -2.5 to +0.4 | Sufficient evidence | +0.3 | -1.4 | +4.5range +3.7 to +5.3 | 3,243 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Grambling | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.1 | -0.4 to +0.6 | Limited evidence | -0.6 | +0.8 | +3.2range +2.8 to +3.7 | 320 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail | |
| 2024 | Grambling | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.7 | -1.8 to +1.0 | Sufficient evidence | -0.4 | -0.3 | +2.4range +1.8 to +3.2 | 2,541 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology