Luke Jungers
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1259:24 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 73
- Minutes per game
- 17:15
- Points per game
- 5.9
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.1 / 0.4
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 5.9 | 2.1 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 2.0 |
| Per 40 minutes | 13.8 | 4.8 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 1.6 | 4.6 |
| Season totals | 434 | 151 | 27 | 22 | 11 | 49 | 144 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 138–343 | 40.2% | 4.7 | 10.9 |
| 2P | 38–89 | 42.7%† | 1.2 | 2.8 |
| 3P | 100–254 | 39.4% | 3.5 | 8.1 |
| FT | 58–76 | 76.3% | 1.0 | 2.4 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 54.8% | 57.6% | 74.1% | 22.2% | 0.55 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Luke Jungers | NE Omaha | 26 | 17:08 | 6.3 | 2.6 | 0.4 | 14.8 | 39.3% | 77.4% | 52.3% |
| 2024 Luke Jungers | NE Omaha | 5Few games | 11:39 | 5.0 | 2.2 | 0.2 | 17.2 | 40.0%† | 71.4%† | 59.3%† |
| 2025 Luke Jungers | Iona | 12 | 22:01 | 5.3 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 9.7 | 31.6% | 66.7%† | 48.8%† |
| 2026 Luke Jungers | Iona | 30 | 16:23 | 6.0 | 1.9 | 0.2 | 14.6 | 43.9% | 78.1% | 68.1% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Iona · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $16K
- 80% range $3K to $56K
- Median share of team pool
- 7.6%
- team pool $235K, 80% range $81K to $625K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $14K to $21K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 37.2%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Iona: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Iona | $16Kspeculative | $3K to $56K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +0.8 | -0.9 to +2.6 | Sufficient evidence | +1.1 | -0.4 | +2.8range +2.3 to +3.2 | 1,596 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Iona | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.7 | -1.5 to +0.3 | Sufficient evidence | -0.2 | -0.5 | +2.9range +2.4 to +3.4 | 895 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
| 2023 | NE Omaha | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -3.0 | -4.0 to -2.0 | Sufficient evidence | +0.3 | -3.3 | +0.8range +0.5 to +1.1 | 1,329 | Season detail | |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology