Avery Brown
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1914:45 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 65
- Minutes per game
- 29:27
- Points per game
- 10.0
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.3 / 2.4
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 10.0 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 2.2 | 2.4 |
| Per 40 minutes | 13.6 | 3.1 | 3.3 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 2.9 | 3.2 |
| Season totals | 651 | 149 | 157 | 57 | 10 | 140 | 153 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 208–582 | 35.7% | 9.0 | 12.2 |
| 2P | 160–411 | 38.9% | 6.3 | 8.6 |
| 3P | 48–171 | 28.1% | 2.6 | 3.6 |
| FT | 187–250 | 74.8% | 3.8 | 5.2 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 39.9% | 47.0% | 29.4% | 43.0% | 1.12 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Avery Brown | Columbia | 21 | 30:05 | 9.3 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 12.3 | 31.1% | 71.2% | 42.4% |
| 2024 Avery Brown | Columbia | 18 | 31:56 | 9.4 | 3.0 | 2.7 | 11.8 | 23.9%† | 75.0% | 47.3% |
| 2025 Avery Brown | Columbia | 23 | 28:56 | 11.9 | 1.8 | 2.7 | 16.5 | 25.0% | 77.4% | 50.6% |
| 2026 Avery Brown | Columbia | 3Few games | 14:19 | 4.3 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 12.1 | 75.0%† | 50.0%† | 50.9%† |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Columbia · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $0 (assumed opted out)
- 80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)
- Tier
- Low and other
- low evidence
This school did not opt in to House-settlement revenue sharing (Sportico, 2025-07-18), so its modelled pool is exactly zero. Other schools may also have opted out; they are treated as opted in. Assumption "opt-out list": one press article names schools that did not opt in; it is unverified and other schools may differ. Speculative, not observed pay.
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Columbia: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Not applicable | $0 (assumed opted out) | 80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data) | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
| 2025 | Columbia | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.5 | -2.9 to -0.2 | Sufficient evidence | +0.6 | -2.1 | +2.1range +1.6 to +2.7 | 2,418 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Columbia | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.4 | -2.1 to -0.6 | Sufficient evidence | -0.4 | -0.9 | +2.0range +1.6 to +2.4 | 2,046 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Columbia | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -4.0 | -5.1 to -2.8 | Sufficient evidence | -1.5 | -2.5 | +0.7range +0.3 to +1.2 | 2,220 | Season detail | |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology