Ezra Ausar
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
2861:03 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 110
- Minutes per game
- 26:01
- Points per game
- 12.5
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 5.6 / 1.1
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 12.5 | 5.6 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 1.9 | 2.9 |
| Per 40 minutes | 19.2 | 8.6 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 0.7 | 2.9 | 4.4 |
| Season totals | 1372 | 615 | 116 | 97 | 48 | 209 | 318 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 472–874 | 54.0% | 7.9 | 12.2 |
| 2P | 465–844 | 55.1% | 7.7 | 11.8 |
| 3P | 7–30 | 23.3%† | 0.3 | 0.4 |
| FT | 421–669 | 62.9% | 6.1 | 9.4 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 54.4% | 58.7% | 3.4% | 76.5% | 0.56 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Ezra Ausar | East Carolina | 25 | 23:51 | 10.8 | 5.6 | 0.4 | 18.1 | — | 56.6% | 57.8% |
| 2024 Ezra Ausar | East Carolina | 26 | 26:06 | 10.8 | 4.5 | 1.0 | 16.6 | 42.9%† | 62.9% | 57.0% |
| 2025 Ezra Ausar | Utah | 28 | 23:47 | 13.0 | 5.4 | 0.9 | 21.8 | 7.1%† | 61.5% | 56.2% |
| 2026 Ezra Ausar | Southern California | 31 | 29:41 | 14.8 | 6.6 | 1.7 | 19.9 | 0.0%† | 67.0% | 62.7% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
USC · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $475K
- 80% range $205K to $735K
- Median share of team pool
- 13.9%
- team pool $3.55M, 80% range $2.60M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $475K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $20K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 73.7%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
USC: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | USC | $475Kspeculative | $205K to $735K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.5 | +0.4 to +2.5 | Sufficient evidence | +0.1 | +1.4 | +4.8range +4.3 to +5.3 | 3,213 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Utah | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +2.0 | +0.6 to +3.4 | Sufficient evidence | -0.2 | +2.1 | +3.0range +2.6 to +3.6 | 2,208 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | East Carolina | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.9 | -3.5 to -0.4 | Sufficient evidence | -1.2 | -0.7 | +1.9range +1.1 to +2.6 | 2,292 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | East Carolina | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.2 | -3.2 to +0.5 | Sufficient evidence | -0.9 | -0.4 | +2.0range +1.1 to +2.7 | 2,094 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology