Josh Dix
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
3149:31 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 126
- Minutes per game
- 25:00
- Points per game
- 9.7
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.5 / 1.9
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 9.7 | 2.5 | 1.9 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 1.1 |
| Per 40 minutes | 15.5 | 4.1 | 3.1 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 1.3 | 1.7 |
| Season totals | 1223 | 321 | 244 | 81 | 34 | 100 | 136 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 461–959 | 48.1% | 7.6 | 12.2 |
| 2P | 288–505 | 57.0% | 4.0 | 6.4 |
| 3P | 173–454 | 38.1% | 3.6 | 5.8 |
| FT | 128–156 | 82.1% | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 57.1% | 59.5% | 47.3% | 16.3% | 2.44 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Josh Dix | Iowa | 30 | 8:46 | 2.1 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 9.4 | 41.2%† | 66.7%† | 57.4%† |
| 2024 Josh Dix | Iowa | 33 | 24:30 | 8.9 | 2.2 | 1.8 | 14.6 | 42.7% | 86.0% | 65.3% |
| 2025 Josh Dix | Iowa | 29 | 33:06 | 14.4 | 3.2 | 2.8 | 17.4 | 41.1% | 75.0% | 60.0% |
| 2026 Josh Dix | Creighton | 34 | 32:53 | 13.2 | 3.7 | 2.3 | 16.1 | 33.8% | 86.7% | 56.1% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Creighton · Big East and Gonzaga · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $575K
- 80% range $270K to $1.15M
- Median share of team pool
- 18.1%
- team pool $3.10M, 80% range $1.75M to $5.45M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $555K to $615K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $20K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 82.0%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Creighton: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Creighton | $575Kspeculative | $270K to $1.15M | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +2.3 | +0.8 to +3.6 | Sufficient evidence | +1.6 | +0.7 | +6.4range +5.5 to +7.1 | 3,617 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Iowa | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.4 | -0.9 to +1.6 | Sufficient evidence | +2.6 | -2.1 | +3.8range +3.2 to +4.5 | 3,283 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Iowa | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.7 | -0.4 to +2.0 | Sufficient evidence | +1.8 | -1.1 | +2.7range +2.1 to +3.3 | 2,711 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Iowa | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.7 | -0.2 to +1.3 | Sufficient evidence | +1.0 | -0.3 | +1.1range +0.9 to +1.3 | 919 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology