Henri Veesaar
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1795:27 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 81
- Minutes per game
- 22:10
- Points per game
- 10.8
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 5.7 / 1.4
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 10.8 | 5.7 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 2.3 |
| Per 40 minutes | 19.6 | 10.3 | 2.6 | 1.0 | 1.8 | 2.2 | 4.2 |
| Season totals | 878 | 463 | 115 | 44 | 83 | 97 | 188 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 339–567 | 59.8% | 7.0 | 12.6 |
| 2P | 283–421 | 67.2% | 5.2 | 9.4 |
| 3P | 56–146 | 38.4% | 1.8 | 3.3 |
| FT | 144–222 | 64.9% | 2.7 | 4.9 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 64.7% | 66.0% | 25.7% | 39.2% | 1.19 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Henri Veesaar | Arizona | 15Under 100 minutes | 6:15 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 9.0 | 0.0%† | 60.0%† | 57.7%† |
| 2025 Henri Veesaar | Arizona | 35 | 20:54 | 9.4 | 5.0 | 1.3 | 18.0 | 32.7%† | 69.0% | 65.0% |
| 2026 Henri Veesaar | North Carolina | 31 | 31:18 | 17.0 | 8.7 | 2.1 | 21.8 | 42.6% | 61.5% | 67.1% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
North Carolina · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $1.20M
- 80% range $680K to $2.30M
- Median share of team pool
- 31.9%
- team pool $3.60M, 80% range $2.60M to $5.00M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $1.20M in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $22K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 73.0%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
North Carolina: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | North Carolina | $1.20Mspeculative | $680K to $2.30M | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +8.9 | +7.4 to +10.0 | Sufficient evidence | +3.8 | +5.1 | +9.0range +8.2 to +9.5 | 3,111 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Arizona | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +5.7 | +4.3 to +7.0 | Sufficient evidence | +2.7 | +3.0 | +4.8range +4.3 to +5.4 | 2,607 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Arizona | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.7 | +0.7 to +2.5 | Limited evidence | +0.4 | +1.4 | +0.6range +0.5 to +0.7 | 339 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology