Solomon Washington
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
2297:24 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 98
- Minutes per game
- 23:27
- Points per game
- 6.4
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 6.0 / 0.8
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 6.4 | 6.0 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.6 |
| Per 40 minutes | 10.9 | 10.2 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 4.4 |
| Season totals | 624 | 584 | 75 | 85 | 97 | 101 | 253 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 214–503 | 42.5% | 5.1 | 8.8 |
| 2P | 184–361 | 51.0% | 3.7 | 6.3 |
| 3P | 30–142 | 21.1% | 1.4 | 2.5 |
| FT | 166–245 | 67.8% | 2.5 | 4.3 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 45.5% | 51.1% | 28.2% | 48.7% | 0.74 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Solomon Washington | Texas A&M | 14 | 11:02 | 2.1 | 2.6 | 0.2 | 7.8 | 0.0%† | 80.0%† | 47.8%† |
| 2024 Solomon Washington | Texas A&M | 30 | 23:30 | 7.3 | 5.8 | 0.8 | 12.4 | 26.4% | 73.7% | 56.9% |
| 2025 Solomon Washington | Texas A&M | 29 | 22:12 | 4.5 | 5.0 | 0.8 | 8.1 | 14.9%† | 66.0% | 43.6% |
| 2026 Solomon Washington | Maryland | 25 | 31:47 | 9.8 | 9.2 | 1.0 | 12.4 | 24.3%† | 63.3% | 51.5% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Maryland · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $700K
- 80% range $350K to $1.80M
- Median share of team pool
- 18.1%
- team pool $3.60M, 80% range $2.60M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $700K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $29K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 70.2%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Maryland: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Maryland | $700Kspeculative | $350K to $1.80M | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.0 | -0.4 to +2.3 | Sufficient evidence | -0.5 | +1.5 | +3.3range +2.8 to +3.7 | 2,495 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Texas A&M | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +3.2 | +1.9 to +4.8 | Sufficient evidence | -0.4 | +3.6 | +4.1range +3.6 to +4.7 | 2,235 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Texas A&M | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +3.3 | +2.1 to +4.2 | Sufficient evidence | +1.4 | +1.9 | +3.8range +3.2 to +4.4 | 2,458 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Texas A&M | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.0 | -0.7 to +0.7 | Limited evidence | +0.0 | -0.0 | +1.1range +0.9 to +1.3 | 520 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology