Bryce Harris
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
2454:00 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 100
- Minutes per game
- 24:32
- Points per game
- 11.6
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 5.4 / 1.4
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 11.6 | 5.4 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Per 40 minutes | 18.9 | 8.8 | 2.3 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 2.8 | 3.1 |
| Season totals | 1161 | 537 | 142 | 75 | 80 | 171 | 192 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 401–814 | 49.3% | 8.1 | 13.3 |
| 2P | 323–603 | 53.6% | 6.0 | 9.8 |
| 3P | 78–211 | 37.0% | 2.1 | 3.4 |
| FT | 281–378 | 74.3% | 3.8 | 6.2 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 54.1% | 59.2% | 25.9% | 46.4% | 0.83 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Bryce Harris | Howard | 15 | 9:58 | 3.1 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 12.6 | 37.5%† | 50.0%† | 49.7%† |
| 2023 Bryce Harris | Howard | 25 | 16:29 | 6.7 | 3.2 | 0.5 | 16.2 | 33.3%† | 68.8% | 60.5% |
| 2024 Bryce Harris | Howard | 23 | 31:16 | 15.9 | 7.7 | 1.7 | 20.3 | 38.0% | 75.8% | 62.5% |
| 2025 Bryce Harris | Howard | 6Few games | 23:51 | 9.3 | 5.3 | 1.2 | 15.7 | 25.0%† | 46.2%† | 46.1%† |
| 2026 Bryce Harris | Howard | 31 | 33:14 | 17.0 | 7.1 | 2.4 | 20.4 | 39.4% | 77.8% | 59.5% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Howard · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $57K
- 80% range $20K to $170K
- Median share of team pool
- 23.9%
- team pool $225K, 80% range $82K to $600K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $56K to $58K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $1K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 82.7%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Howard: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Howard | $57Kspeculative | $20K to $170K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +3.8 | +2.2 to +5.0 | Sufficient evidence | +1.4 | +2.4 | +6.0range +5.2 to +6.8 | 3,343 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Howard | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.1 | -1.9 to -0.3 | Limited evidence | -0.7 | -0.5 | +0.5range +0.4 to +0.6 | 501 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail | |
| 2024 | Howard | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.3 | -0.7 to +1.4 | Sufficient evidence | +1.6 | -1.3 | +3.6range +2.9 to +4.4 | 2,487 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Howard | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.6 | -0.7 to +1.8 | Sufficient evidence | -0.1 | +0.7 | +1.9range +1.5 to +2.3 | 1,486 | Season detail | |
| 2022 | Howard | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -1.8 | -2.8 to -0.9 | Limited evidence | -1.6 | -0.2 | Not computed for this season | 536 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology