Zee Hamoda
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
2025:12 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 109
- Minutes per game
- 18:35
- Points per game
- 6.9
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.6 / 1.0
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 6.9 | 2.6 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| Per 40 minutes | 14.8 | 5.7 | 2.2 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 3.1 | 3.9 |
| Season totals | 748 | 288 | 109 | 64 | 35 | 158 | 196 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 267–685 | 39.0% | 6.3 | 13.5 |
| 2P | 138–301 | 45.8% | 2.8 | 5.9 |
| 3P | 129–384 | 33.6% | 3.5 | 7.6 |
| FT | 85–110 | 77.3% | 1.0 | 2.2 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 48.4% | 51.0% | 56.1% | 16.1% | 0.69 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Zee Hamoda | Utah St | 23 | 7:42 | 2.3 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 11.7 | 24.2%† | 66.7%† | 40.4%† |
| 2023 Zee Hamoda | Utah St | 27 | 12:37 | 3.0 | 2.2 | 0.5 | 9.6 | 28.2%† | 83.3%† | 45.2%† |
| 2024 Zee Hamoda | CS Sacramento | 31 | 29:46 | 11.7 | 4.0 | 1.6 | 15.7 | 33.5% | 77.6% | 51.8% |
| 2026 Zee Hamoda | Nicholls | 28 | 20:53 | 9.0 | 2.8 | 1.1 | 17.2 | 37.3% | 76.0% | 55.0% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Nicholls St · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $12K
- 80% range $3K to $42K
- Median share of team pool
- 8.3%
- team pool $165K, 80% range $63K to $455K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $12K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $1K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 41.4%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Nicholls St: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Nicholls St | $12Kspeculative | $3K to $42K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +0.2 | -0.6 to +1.0 | Sufficient evidence | -0.5 | +0.7 | +2.7range +2.4 to +3.0 | 1,419 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | CS Sacramento | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.2 | -2.5 to +0.0 | Sufficient evidence | -0.6 | -0.6 | +2.2range +1.6 to +2.9 | 2,946 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Utah St | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.8 | -3.4 to -0.4 | Sufficient evidence | -1.1 | -0.7 | +1.1range +0.6 to +1.4 | 1,117 | Season detail | |
| 2022 | Utah St | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -0.9 | -2.0 to +0.1 | Limited evidence | -0.4 | -0.5 | Not computed for this season | 578 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology