D.J. Smith
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
3249:54 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 108
- Minutes per game
- 30:06
- Points per game
- 11.8
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.6 / 2.4
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 11.8 | 2.6 | 2.4 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| Per 40 minutes | 15.6 | 3.5 | 3.2 | 1.4 | 0.1 | 2.7 | 2.7 |
| Season totals | 1270 | 283 | 264 | 111 | 10 | 223 | 216 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 392–1015 | 38.6% | 9.4 | 12.5 |
| 2P | 207–471 | 43.9% | 4.4 | 5.8 |
| 3P | 185–544 | 34.0% | 5.0 | 6.7 |
| FT | 301–368 | 81.8% | 3.4 | 4.5 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47.7% | 54.0% | 53.6% | 36.3% | 1.18 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 D.J. Smith | Ark Little Rock | 17 | 26:27 | 6.6 | 1.9 | 2.1 | 10.1 | 29.7%† | 71.8% | 47.8% |
| 2023 D.J. Smith | Ark Little Rock | 25 | 30:33 | 10.5 | 2.6 | 2.8 | 13.8 | 30.5% | 85.5% | 51.5% |
| 2024 D.J. Smith | Bowling Green | 5Few games | 18:09 | 5.2 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 11.5 | 28.6%† | 100.0%† | 50.7%† |
| 2025 D.J. Smith | Robert Morris | 29 | 28:21 | 9.2 | 2.3 | 3.1 | 13.0 | 40.7% | 81.0% | 56.4% |
| 2026 D.J. Smith | Campbell | 32 | 35:07 | 18.8 | 3.5 | 2.0 | 21.4 | 33.3% | 82.3% | 55.5% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Campbell · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $67K
- 80% range $24K to $200K
- Median share of team pool
- 25.3%
- team pool $245K, 80% range $92K to $670K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $60K to $70K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 90.9%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Campbell: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Campbell | $67Kspeculative | $24K to $200K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +2.0 | +1.1 to +2.9 | Sufficient evidence | +1.4 | +0.6 | +6.7range +6.1 to +7.3 | 3,426 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Robert Morris | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.8 | +0.5 to +3.1 | Sufficient evidence | +1.1 | +0.7 | +4.6range +3.8 to +5.4 | 2,904 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Bowling Green | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.5 | -1.5 to +0.3 | Limited evidence | +0.0 | -0.6 | +0.4range +0.3 to +0.5 | 318 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail | |
| 2023 | Ark Little Rock | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -2.8 | -4.0 to -1.8 | Sufficient evidence | -0.3 | -2.5 | +1.7range +1.1 to +2.4 | 2,810 | Season detail | |
| 2022 | Ark Little Rock | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -4.3 | -5.4 to -2.8 | Sufficient evidence | -2.1 | -2.2 | Not computed for this season | 1,341 |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology