Malik Edmead
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1029:42 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 65
- Minutes per game
- 15:50
- Points per game
- 6.1
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 1.4 / 1.6
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 6.1 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| Per 40 minutes | 15.4 | 3.7 | 4.1 | 2.4 | 0.2 | 3.4 | 3.3 |
| Season totals | 396 | 94 | 105 | 62 | 6 | 87 | 84 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 151–352 | 42.9% | 5.4 | 13.7 |
| 2P | 118–277 | 42.6% | 4.3 | 10.8 |
| 3P | 33–75 | 44.0% | 1.2 | 2.9 |
| FT | 61–105 | 58.1% | 1.6 | 4.1 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47.6% | 49.7% | 21.3% | 29.8% | 1.21 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Malik Edmead | Merrimack | 9Few games | 15:14 | 7.8 | 1.2 | 2.0 | 20.4 | 14.3%† | 52.4%† | 52.8%† |
| 2022 Malik Edmead | Merrimack | 22 | 22:07 | 9.6 | 1.9 | 2.3 | 17.3 | 51.0%† | 65.3% | 55.7% |
| 2025 Malik Edmead | Merrimack | 27 | 12:33 | 4.0 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 12.6 | 36.8%† | 50.0% | 42.8% |
| 2026 Malik Edmead | Merrimack | 7Few games | 9:37 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 4.8 | — | 66.7%† | 23.1%† |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Merrimack · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $2K
- 80% range $1K to $6K
- Median share of team pool
- 0.8%
- team pool $265K, 80% range $97K to $700K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $2K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 5.3%
- Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
- Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Merrimack: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Not applicable | $2Kspeculative, floor only | $1K to $6K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
| 2025 | Merrimack | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.2 | -1.3 to +0.9 | Sufficient evidence | -0.7 | +0.6 | +1.4range +1.1 to +1.7 | 1,071 | Season detail | |
| 2022 | Merrimack | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +0.6 | -0.6 to +1.6 | Sufficient evidence | +0.3 | +0.3 | Not computed for this season | 1,503 | ||
| 2021 | Merrimack | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +0.5 | -0.3 to +1.3 | Limited evidence | +0.3 | +0.1 | Not computed for this season | 474 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. 2020-21 season, shortened by COVID-19 cancellations; kept in the model fit with this flag. | |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology