Josh Odunowo
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
2333:40 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 102
- Minutes per game
- 22:53
- Points per game
- 7.9
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 4.5 / 1.3
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 7.9 | 4.5 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 2.6 |
| Per 40 minutes | 13.8 | 7.8 | 2.3 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 2.0 | 4.5 |
| Season totals | 804 | 457 | 133 | 58 | 65 | 116 | 263 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 309–572 | 54.0% | 5.6 | 9.8 |
| 2P | 309–565 | 54.7% | 5.5 | 9.7 |
| 3P | 0–7 | 0.0%† | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| FT | 186–289 | 64.4% | 2.8 | 5.0 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 54.0% | 57.5% | 1.2% | 50.5% | 1.15 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Josh Odunowo | Columbia | 9Few games | 22:02 | 8.9 | 4.8 | 0.7 | 16.1 | — | 62.5% | 64.4%† |
| 2023 Josh Odunowo | Columbia | 21 | 18:33 | 3.6 | 3.2 | 0.6 | 7.7 | — | 45.8%† | 43.8%† |
| 2024 Josh Odunowo | Columbia | 18 | 19:52 | 6.9 | 3.9 | 1.9 | 14.0 | — | 63.6% | 56.6%† |
| 2025 Josh Odunowo | UMBC | 25 | 28:35 | 11.5 | 4.9 | 2.1 | 16.1 | 0.0%† | 60.7% | 60.0% |
| 2026 Josh Odunowo | UMBC | 29 | 23:13 | 8.2 | 5.3 | 1.0 | 14.1 | — | 74.2% | 58.7% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
UMBC · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $0 (assumed opted out)
- 80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)
- Tier
- Low and other
- low evidence
This school did not opt in to House-settlement revenue sharing (Sportico, 2025-07-18), so its modelled pool is exactly zero. Other schools may also have opted out; they are treated as opted in. Assumption "opt-out list": one press article names schools that did not opt in; it is unverified and other schools may differ. Speculative, not observed pay.
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
UMBC: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | UMBC | $0 (assumed opted out) | 80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data) | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.6 | -0.0 to +3.1 | Sufficient evidence | +0.9 | +0.7 | +3.4range +2.8 to +3.9 | 2,078 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | UMBC | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.2 | -1.7 to +1.1 | Sufficient evidence | +0.0 | -0.3 | +2.8range +2.3 to +3.4 | 2,581 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Columbia | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.3 | -0.6 to +1.1 | Sufficient evidence | +0.2 | +0.0 | +1.7range +1.4 to +2.0 | 1,285 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Columbia | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.6 | -2.6 to -0.6 | Sufficient evidence | -1.7 | +0.1 | +0.9range +0.6 to +1.1 | 1,382 | Season detail | |
| 2022 | Columbia | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -0.0 | -1.3 to +1.1 | Sufficient evidence | +0.2 | -0.3 | Not computed for this season | 684 |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology