Dawson Baker
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
2104:12 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 94
- Minutes per game
- 22:23
- Points per game
- 10.7
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.3 / 1.3
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 10.7 | 2.3 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 1.5 | 1.4 |
| Per 40 minutes | 19.1 | 4.0 | 2.3 | 1.3 | 0.1 | 2.6 | 2.6 |
| Season totals | 1003 | 212 | 122 | 67 | 6 | 138 | 135 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 354–770 | 46.0% | 8.2 | 14.6 |
| 2P | 240–485 | 49.5% | 5.2 | 9.2 |
| 3P | 114–285 | 40.0% | 3.0 | 5.4 |
| FT | 181–225 | 80.4% | 2.4 | 4.3 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 53.4% | 57.7% | 37.0% | 29.2% | 0.88 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Dawson Baker | UC Irvine | 18 | 23:52 | 11.1 | 2.2 | 1.3 | 18.6 | 41.9%† | 79.1% | 58.5% |
| 2022 Dawson Baker | UC Irvine | 16 | 27:36 | 11.1 | 2.2 | 1.1 | 16.0 | 34.8%† | 80.5% | 52.0% |
| 2023 Dawson Baker | UC Irvine | 19 | 29:51 | 16.7 | 3.1 | 1.5 | 22.4 | 37.5% | 80.9% | 57.2% |
| 2024 Dawson Baker | BYU | 4Few games | 10:06 | 5.0 | 0.8 | 1.5 | 19.8 | 50.0%† | — | 62.5%† |
| 2025 Dawson Baker | BYU | 31 | 16:19 | 7.8 | 2.1 | 1.4 | 19.2 | 41.9% | 79.1% | 61.1% |
| 2026 Dawson Baker | BYU | 6Few games | 19:54 | 7.5 | 1.7 | 0.5 | 15.1 | 47.4%† | 88.9%† | 64.4%† |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
BYU · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $49K
- 80% range $25K to $79K
- Median share of team pool
- 1.4%
- team pool $3.60M, 80% range $2.60M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $49K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $25K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 7.9%
- Limited evidence
- Limited evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
BYU: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | BYU | $49Kspeculative | $25K to $79K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +0.7 | +0.4 to +0.9 | Limited evidence | +1.0 | -0.3 | +0.6range +0.5 to +0.6 | 368 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail | |
| 2025 | BYU | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +2.3 | +1.0 to +3.5 | Sufficient evidence | +1.9 | +0.4 | +2.5range +2.1 to +2.9 | 1,654 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
| 2023 | UC Irvine | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +2.7 | +1.3 to +3.9 | Sufficient evidence | +1.2 | +1.5 | +4.9range +4.0 to +5.7 | 2,001 | Season detail | |
| 2022 | UC Irvine | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +1.5 | +0.4 to +2.3 | Sufficient evidence | +0.2 | +1.3 | Not computed for this season | 1,444 | ||
| 2021 | UC Irvine | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +1.1 | -0.1 to +2.3 | Sufficient evidence | +0.8 | +0.4 | Not computed for this season | 1,438 | 2020-21 season, shortened by COVID-19 cancellations; kept in the model fit with this flag. | |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology