Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Kam Woods

Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.

Observed career performance

2677:44 minutes logged

Games logged
89
Minutes per game
30:05
Points per game
11.7
Rebounds / assists per game
3.9 / 3.3
Box line on three bases
BasisPtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF
Per game11.73.93.31.40.12.41.9
Per 40 minutes15.65.14.41.90.13.22.5
Season totals10453432961246211168
Shooting with attempts
ShotMade–att.PctAtt/GAtt/40
FG367–96638.0%10.914.4
2P251–57144.0%6.48.5
3P116–39529.4%4.45.9
FT195–30164.8%3.44.5
Derived rates (computed here from the box line, not published statistics)
eFG%Estimated TS%3PA / FGAFTA / FGAAST / TO
44.0%47.6%40.9%31.2%1.40

Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions

Linked seasons

Linked seasons, per-game and shooting rates. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the declared floor.
SeasonTeamGMPGPtsRebAstPts/403P%FT%TS%
2021 Kam WoodsTroy 1326:099.93.31.615.226.8%68.6%44.4%
2023 Kam WoodsNC A&T 2136:4717.74.23.419.233.1%69.4%50.6%
2024 Kam WoodsNC State 12Under 100 minutes7:311.10.80.25.840.0%†50.0%†34.9%†
2025 Kam WoodsRobert Morris 2436:1514.85.05.316.428.8%60.0%45.9%
2026 Kam WoodsSouthern California 1931:519.34.24.011.617.5%†63.5%48.9%

Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.

Speculative compensation · 2025–26β

USC · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.

Speculative best guess
$145K
80% range $18K to $310K
Median share of team pool
4.5%
team pool $3.55M, 80% range $2.60M to $4.95M
Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
$145K in all four
the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
Floor part
$20K
shared by every player with possessions
Possession share
45.8%
Sufficient evidence
Point and 80% range on the team table's axis. Open circle: limited evidence or floor only.
  • Range driven by assumption, not data

Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.

Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.

Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks

Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.

USC: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player

No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.

Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ

Net points per 100 possessions by season, newest first. The speculative compensation best guess for 2025–26 only sits right after the team, so it is the first figure after the season. Ordered by season, not by value or dollars. Compensation is a best guess of a share of the school’s own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.
SeasonTeamSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% rangeSplit roleNetRangeEvidenceRange graphic. Position on one axisOffenseDefenseWins above replacementOn-court possessionsSample and flags
2026USC$145Kspeculative$18K to $310Kdescriptive: not used in fit or gates-0.7-1.8 to +0.3Sufficient evidence-0.1-0.6+2.5range +2.1 to +2.81,997Season detail
2025Robert MorrisNone: no budget that season—evaluation: examined, post hoc+0.5-0.7 to +1.4Sufficient evidence+0.9-0.4+4.1range +3.4 to +4.83,063Season detail
2024NC StateNone: no budget that season—evaluation: examined, post hoc-3.4-4.1 to -2.6Limited evidence-2.3-1.1+0.1range +0.1 to +0.2312Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail
2023NC A&TNone: no budget that season—evaluation: examined, post hoc-1.6-3.1 to -0.1Sufficient evidence-0.1-1.5+2.3range +1.5 to +3.12,779Season detail
2021TroyNone: no budget that season—development: in model selection-2.3-3.2 to -1.3Sufficient evidence-1.7-0.7Not computed for this season1,2102020-21 season, shortened by COVID-19 cancellations; kept in the model fit with this flag.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology