Hunter Erickson
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
2222:58 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 117
- Minutes per game
- 19:00
- Points per game
- 4.6
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 1.8 / 2.0
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 4.6 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| Per 40 minutes | 9.7 | 3.9 | 4.3 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 2.9 |
| Season totals | 541 | 216 | 239 | 65 | 30 | 141 | 162 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 188–440 | 42.7% | 3.8 | 7.9 |
| 2P | 100–186 | 53.8% | 1.6 | 3.3 |
| 3P | 88–254 | 34.6% | 2.2 | 4.6 |
| FT | 77–112 | 68.8% | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52.7% | 55.3% | 57.7% | 25.5% | 1.70 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Hunter Erickson | BYU | 7Few games | 2:03 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0%† | — | 0.0%† |
| 2022 Hunter Erickson | BYU | 14Under 100 minutes | 4:08 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 3.5 | 50.0%† | — | 35.7%† |
| 2024 Hunter Erickson | Utah | 35 | 18:51 | 4.8 | 1.3 | 1.9 | 10.2 | 35.8% | 47.8%† | 53.8% |
| 2025 Hunter Erickson | Utah | 30 | 17:45 | 3.8 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 8.5 | 33.3% | 82.1% | 56.3%† |
| 2026 Hunter Erickson | Hawaii | 31 | 30:55 | 8.2 | 3.8 | 3.9 | 10.6 | 34.6% | 70.5% | 56.7% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Hawaii · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $58K
- 80% range $20K to $170K
- Median share of team pool
- 17.0%
- team pool $340K, 80% range $125K to $905K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $47K to $64K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $3K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 77.5%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Hawaii: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Hawaii | $58Kspeculative | $20K to $170K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +2.4 | +1.0 to +3.9 | Sufficient evidence | +1.0 | +1.5 | +6.2range +5.3 to +7.0 | 1,798 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Utah | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.4 | -1.2 to +2.0 | Sufficient evidence | +1.0 | -0.7 | +2.0range +1.6 to +2.5 | 1,759 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Utah | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.1 | -1.8 to +1.9 | Sufficient evidence | +0.3 | -0.4 | +1.9range +1.3 to +2.6 | 2,113 | Season detail | |
| 2022 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
| 2021 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology