Davion Bradford
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1331:43 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 98
- Minutes per game
- 13:35
- Points per game
- 3.7
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.4 / 0.2
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 3.7 | 2.4 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 1.8 |
| Per 40 minutes | 10.8 | 7.0 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 1.1 | 2.6 | 5.4 |
| Season totals | 359 | 233 | 19 | 12 | 38 | 85 | 181 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 138–241 | 57.3% | 2.5 | 7.2 |
| 2P | 138–238 | 58.0% | 2.4 | 7.1 |
| 3P | 0–3 | 0.0%† | 0.0 | 0.1 |
| FT | 83–148 | 56.1% | 1.5 | 4.4 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 57.3% | 58.6% | 1.2% | 61.4% | 0.22 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Davion Bradford | Kansas St | 24 | 21:41 | 7.7 | 4.5 | 0.2 | 14.2 | — | 57.4% | 63.0% |
| 2022 Davion Bradford | Kansas St | 25 | 14:35 | 3.3 | 1.6 | 0.2 | 9.0 | — | 72.0% | 54.7%† |
| 2023 Davion Bradford | Wake Forest | 20 | 9:26 | 2.1 | 1.9 | 0.1 | 8.9 | — | 42.1%† | 67.0%† |
| 2025 Davion Bradford | ETSU | 19 | 11:19 | 2.6 | 2.2 | 0.3 | 9.1 | 0.0%† | 50.0% | 52.2%† |
| 2026 Davion Bradford | Tulane | 10Under 100 minutes | 4:19 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 0.0%† | 50.0%† | 8.5%† |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Tulane · Mid and high major · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $6K
- 80% range $2K to $15K
- Median share of team pool
- 0.7%
- team pool $940K, 80% range $425K to $2.15M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $5K to $6K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $6K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 3.3%
- Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
- Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Tulane: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Not applicable | $6Kspeculative, floor only | $2K to $15K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
| 2025 | ETSU | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -2.1 | -3.2 to -0.9 | Sufficient evidence | -1.0 | -1.1 | +0.7range +0.5 to +0.8 | 636 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Wake Forest | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.5 | -1.3 to +0.2 | Sufficient evidence | -1.1 | +0.6 | +0.8range +0.7 to +1.0 | 674 | Season detail | |
| 2022 | Kansas St | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -1.2 | -2.3 to -0.2 | Sufficient evidence | -1.4 | +0.2 | Not computed for this season | 1,246 | ||
| 2021 | Kansas St | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -0.2 | -1.5 to +1.0 | Sufficient evidence | -0.7 | +0.5 | Not computed for this season | 1,749 | 2020-21 season, shortened by COVID-19 cancellations; kept in the model fit with this flag. | |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology