Trevon Brazile
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
2982:50 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 117
- Minutes per game
- 25:30
- Points per game
- 9.3
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 6.1 / 1.0
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 9.3 | 6.1 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Per 40 minutes | 14.6 | 9.5 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 2.2 | 1.9 | 3.1 |
| Season totals | 1090 | 709 | 115 | 104 | 166 | 138 | 229 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 401–755 | 53.1% | 6.5 | 10.1 |
| 2P | 296–458 | 64.6% | 3.9 | 6.1 |
| 3P | 105–297 | 35.4% | 2.5 | 4.0 |
| FT | 183–278 | 65.8% | 2.4 | 3.7 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 60.1% | 62.1% | 39.3% | 36.8% | 0.83 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Trevon Brazile | Missouri | 23 | 22:19 | 6.9 | 5.1 | 0.8 | 12.4 | 33.3%† | 63.0% | 60.6% |
| 2023 Trevon Brazile | Arkansas | 9Few games | 26:55 | 11.8 | 6.0 | 1.0 | 17.5 | 37.9%† | 67.7% | 58.5%† |
| 2024 Trevon Brazile | Arkansas | 20 | 26:22 | 8.9 | 6.2 | 0.5 | 13.5 | 34.5% | 66.0% | 59.5% |
| 2025 Trevon Brazile | Arkansas | 29 | 19:38 | 6.1 | 5.2 | 0.7 | 12.5 | 39.2% | 47.1% | 68.0% |
| 2026 Trevon Brazile | Arkansas | 36 | 31:24 | 13.0 | 7.3 | 1.6 | 16.6 | 34.1% | 71.7% | 62.6% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Arkansas · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $605K
- 80% range $390K to $940K
- Median share of team pool
- 16.4%
- team pool $3.60M, 80% range $2.55M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $605K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $27K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 76.1%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Arkansas: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Arkansas | $605Kspeculative | $390K to $940K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +4.4 | +3.0 to +5.6 | Sufficient evidence | +3.0 | +1.4 | +7.9range +7.0 to +8.7 | 4,031 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Arkansas | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.8 | -0.5 to +2.0 | Sufficient evidence | +1.0 | -0.2 | +2.6range +2.2 to +3.1 | 1,948 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Arkansas | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.2 | +0.0 to +2.0 | Sufficient evidence | -0.4 | +1.5 | +2.4range +1.9 to +2.8 | 1,974 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Arkansas | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +2.1 | +1.0 to +3.0 | Sufficient evidence | -0.2 | +2.2 | +1.1range +0.9 to +1.2 | 791 | Season detail | |
| 2022 | Missouri | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +1.7 | +0.9 to +2.3 | Sufficient evidence | -0.1 | +1.8 | Not computed for this season | 1,637 |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology