Robert McCray V
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
2556:43 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 94
- Minutes per game
- 27:12
- Points per game
- 15.7
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.9 / 4.1
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 15.7 | 3.9 | 4.1 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 2.9 | 2.4 |
| Per 40 minutes | 23.1 | 5.8 | 6.0 | 1.7 | 0.6 | 4.3 | 3.5 |
| Season totals | 1477 | 371 | 385 | 106 | 39 | 276 | 225 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 533–1150 | 46.3% | 12.2 | 18.0 |
| 2P | 404–776 | 52.1% | 8.3 | 12.1 |
| 3P | 129–374 | 34.5% | 4.0 | 5.9 |
| FT | 282–383 | 73.6% | 4.1 | 6.0 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52.0% | 56.0% | 32.5% | 33.3% | 1.39 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Robert McCray V | Wake Forest | 10Under 100 minutes | 3:33 | 2.3 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 25.9 | 66.7%† | 50.0%† | 96.8%† |
| 2024 Robert McCray V | Jacksonville | 26 | 31:15 | 18.6 | 4.2 | 3.0 | 23.8 | 36.1% | 72.0% | 59.3% |
| 2025 Robert McCray V | Jacksonville | 25 | 30:15 | 17.2 | 5.1 | 4.2 | 22.8 | 29.7% | 79.2% | 52.4% |
| 2026 Robert McCray V | Florida St. | 33 | 28:52 | 16.3 | 3.8 | 6.1 | 22.6 | 35.5% | 71.3% | 55.3% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Florida St · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $470K
- 80% range $215K to $765K
- Median share of team pool
- 13.7%
- team pool $3.55M, 80% range $2.60M to $4.90M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $470K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $29K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 72.0%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Florida St: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Florida St | $470Kspeculative | $215K to $765K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.7 | +0.3 to +3.0 | Sufficient evidence | +2.6 | -0.9 | +4.8range +4.1 to +5.5 | 3,099 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Jacksonville | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.1 | -0.1 to +2.2 | Sufficient evidence | +0.6 | +0.5 | +3.8range +3.2 to +4.5 | 2,530 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Jacksonville | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.9 | -0.5 to +2.6 | Sufficient evidence | +1.5 | -0.6 | +3.4range +2.7 to +4.2 | 2,337 | Season detail | |
| 2022 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology