Chris Bell
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
2840:30 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 118
- Minutes per game
- 24:04
- Points per game
- 10.6
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.1 / 0.6
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 10.6 | 2.1 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 1.5 |
| Per 40 minutes | 17.6 | 3.5 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 1.6 | 2.6 |
| Season totals | 1248 | 252 | 66 | 51 | 56 | 114 | 182 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 411–957 | 42.9% | 8.1 | 13.5 |
| 2P | 182–370 | 49.2% | 3.1 | 5.2 |
| 3P | 229–587 | 39.0% | 5.0 | 8.3 |
| FT | 197–243 | 81.1% | 2.1 | 3.4 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 54.9% | 58.7% | 61.3% | 25.4% | 0.58 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Chris Bell | Syracuse | 27 | 19:09 | 6.2 | 1.7 | 0.4 | 12.9 | 33.7% | 78.6%† | 52.1% |
| 2024 Chris Bell | Syracuse | 27 | 27:15 | 12.0 | 2.3 | 0.7 | 17.7 | 42.9% | 81.3% | 59.7% |
| 2025 Chris Bell | Syracuse | 31 | 21:20 | 9.2 | 1.9 | 0.5 | 17.2 | 35.7% | 75.9% | 55.3% |
| 2026 Chris Bell | California | 33 | 28:04 | 14.3 | 2.6 | 0.6 | 20.3 | 40.6% | 85.1% | 62.9% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
California · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $350K
- 80% range $80K to $580K
- Median share of team pool
- 10.5%
- team pool $3.60M, 80% range $2.60M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $350K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $22K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 70.3%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
California: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | California | $350Kspeculative | $80K to $580K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +0.9 | -0.5 to +2.1 | Sufficient evidence | +1.3 | -0.4 | +5.0range +4.2 to +5.7 | 3,144 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Syracuse | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -3.0 | -4.2 to -2.0 | Sufficient evidence | -0.3 | -2.7 | +1.4range +0.9 to +1.9 | 2,196 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Syracuse | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.5 | -1.1 to +1.7 | Sufficient evidence | +0.8 | -0.2 | +3.0range +2.3 to +3.7 | 2,598 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Syracuse | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.6 | -1.8 to +0.6 | Sufficient evidence | -0.6 | -0.0 | +1.9range +1.4 to +2.4 | 1,702 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology