Kowacie Reeves Jr.
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
2302:16 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 88
- Minutes per game
- 26:10
- Points per game
- 11.2
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.4 / 0.9
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 11.2 | 3.4 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 1.7 |
| Per 40 minutes | 17.1 | 5.2 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 1.9 | 2.6 |
| Season totals | 982 | 302 | 75 | 60 | 42 | 109 | 151 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 350–829 | 42.2% | 9.4 | 14.4 |
| 2P | 212–421 | 50.4% | 4.8 | 7.3 |
| 3P | 138–408 | 33.8% | 4.6 | 7.1 |
| FT | 144–190 | 75.8% | 2.2 | 3.3 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.5% | 53.8% | 49.2% | 22.9% | 0.69 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Kowacie Reeves Jr. | Florida | 26 | 19:26 | 8.5 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 17.6 | 25.5% | 69.1% | 48.2% |
| 2024 Kowacie Reeves Jr. | Georgia Tech | 28 | 28:49 | 10.0 | 4.1 | 0.8 | 13.9 | 36.2% | 82.6% | 54.4% |
| 2025 Kowacie Reeves Jr. | Georgia Tech | 5Few games | 23:31 | 8.2 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 13.9 | 29.6%† | 33.3%† | 45.2%† |
| 2026 Kowacie Reeves Jr. | Georgia Tech | 29 | 30:05 | 15.1 | 3.8 | 1.2 | 20.1 | 38.7% | 77.9% | 57.8% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Georgia Tech · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $425K
- 80% range $59K to $685K
- Median share of team pool
- 12.7%
- team pool $3.60M, 80% range $2.60M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $425K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $27K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 70.4%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Georgia Tech: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Georgia Tech | $425Kspeculative | $59K to $685K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +0.1 | -1.0 to +1.0 | Sufficient evidence | +0.0 | +0.0 | +3.6range +3.2 to +4.0 | 2,836 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Georgia Tech | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.9 | -2.0 to +0.3 | Limited evidence | -0.4 | -0.5 | +0.4range +0.3 to +0.5 | 453 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail | |
| 2024 | Georgia Tech | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.5 | -0.7 to +1.6 | Sufficient evidence | -0.3 | +0.8 | +2.9range +2.3 to +3.5 | 2,727 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Florida | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.4 | -1.7 to +0.8 | Sufficient evidence | +0.0 | -0.5 | +1.8range +1.4 to +2.2 | 1,710 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology