Curt Lewis
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1878:56 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 93
- Minutes per game
- 20:12
- Points per game
- 6.5
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.2 / 0.9
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 6.5 | 3.2 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 1.5 |
| Per 40 minutes | 12.9 | 6.3 | 1.9 | 1.6 | 0.3 | 1.8 | 3.1 |
| Season totals | 604 | 298 | 87 | 75 | 16 | 83 | 144 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 212–534 | 39.7% | 5.7 | 11.4 |
| 2P | 104–217 | 47.9% | 2.3 | 4.6 |
| 3P | 108–317 | 34.1% | 3.4 | 6.7 |
| FT | 72–122 | 59.0% | 1.3 | 2.6 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49.8% | 51.4% | 59.4% | 22.8% | 1.05 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Curt Lewis | E Kentucky | 11 | 24:27 | 11.0 | 5.5 | 1.7 | 18.0 | 21.7%† | 74.3% | 59.1%† |
| 2022 Curt Lewis | E Kentucky | 23 | 25:23 | 10.3 | 5.4 | 1.3 | 16.2 | 35.0% | 51.0% | 50.1% |
| 2024 Curt Lewis | Missouri | 21 | 8:46 | 2.1 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 9.6 | 24.0%† | 54.5%† | 39.4%† |
| 2025 Curt Lewis | ETSU | 5Few games | 12:55 | 5.4 | 2.4 | 0.8 | 16.7 | 38.5%† | 50.0%† | 52.9%† |
| 2026 Curt Lewis | Southern Miss. | 33 | 23:33 | 5.3 | 2.2 | 0.7 | 9.1 | 36.8% | 57.9%† | 52.3% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Southern Miss · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $22K
- 80% range $4K to $68K
- Median share of team pool
- 10.0%
- team pool $260K, 80% range $97K to $690K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $19K to $22K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 57.0%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Southern Miss: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Southern Miss | $22Kspeculative | $4K to $68K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +0.4 | -0.8 to +1.4 | Sufficient evidence | +0.1 | +0.3 | +4.3range +3.7 to +4.8 | 2,234 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
| 2024 | Missouri | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.9 | -1.8 to +0.0 | Sufficient evidence | -0.6 | -0.3 | +0.5range +0.4 to +0.6 | 646 | Season detail | |
| 2022 | E Kentucky | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -0.6 | -1.9 to +0.7 | Sufficient evidence | +0.4 | -1.0 | Not computed for this season | 2,134 | ||
| 2021 | E Kentucky | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +2.1 | +0.8 to +3.4 | Sufficient evidence | +1.4 | +0.7 | Not computed for this season | 942 | 2020-21 season, shortened by COVID-19 cancellations; kept in the model fit with this flag. | |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology