Alex Hemenway
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1661:00 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 90
- Minutes per game
- 18:27
- Points per game
- 5.5
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 1.4 / 0.6
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 5.5 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 1.3 |
| Per 40 minutes | 11.9 | 3.1 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 2.8 |
| Season totals | 495 | 130 | 52 | 28 | 5 | 47 | 117 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 156–414 | 37.7% | 4.6 | 10.0 |
| 2P | 38–86 | 44.2%† | 1.0 | 2.1 |
| 3P | 118–328 | 36.0% | 3.6 | 7.9 |
| FT | 65–81 | 80.2% | 0.9 | 2.0 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51.9% | 55.0% | 79.2% | 19.6% | 1.11 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Alex Hemenway | Clemson | 12 | 11:18 | 4.5 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 15.9 | 43.8%† | 100.0%† | 69.4%† |
| 2021 Alex Hemenway | Clemson | 21 | 15:53 | 4.9 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 12.4 | 39.0% | 87.5%† | 59.2%† |
| 2022 Alex Hemenway | Clemson | 27 | 14:42 | 5.3 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 14.5 | 41.5% | 73.3% | 62.0% |
| 2026 Alex Hemenway | Evansville | 30 | 26:31 | 6.5 | 1.9 | 0.8 | 9.8 | 30.3% | 81.8% | 46.7% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Evansville · Mid and high major · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $64K
- 80% range $4K to $210K
- Median share of team pool
- 14.3%
- team pool $495K, 80% range $210K to $1.10M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $57K to $78K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $4K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 66.4%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Evansville: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Evansville | $64Kspeculative | $4K to $210K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -0.7 | -1.8 to +0.5 | Sufficient evidence | -1.2 | +0.5 | +2.0range +1.8 to +2.2 | 2,623 | Season detail | |
| 2022 | Clemson | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +1.3 | +0.1 to +2.3 | Sufficient evidence | +2.7 | -1.4 | Not computed for this season | 1,310 | ||
| 2021 | Clemson | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +0.7 | -0.6 to +2.0 | Sufficient evidence | +0.7 | -0.0 | Not computed for this season | 872 | 2020-21 season, shortened by COVID-19 cancellations; kept in the model fit with this flag. | |
| 2020 | Clemson | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +0.1 | -0.7 to +1.0 | Limited evidence | +1.2 | -1.1 | Not computed for this season | 431 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology