Nate Bittle
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
2412:43 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 109
- Minutes per game
- 22:08
- Points per game
- 10.7
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 5.7 / 1.4
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 10.7 | 5.7 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 1.3 | 2.0 |
| Per 40 minutes | 19.4 | 10.3 | 2.6 | 1.1 | 2.8 | 2.3 | 3.6 |
| Season totals | 1169 | 623 | 155 | 67 | 170 | 139 | 218 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 424–863 | 49.1% | 7.9 | 14.3 |
| 2P | 332–579 | 57.3% | 5.3 | 9.6 |
| 3P | 92–284 | 32.4% | 2.6 | 4.7 |
| FT | 229–309 | 74.1% | 2.8 | 5.1 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 54.5% | 58.5% | 32.9% | 35.8% | 1.12 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Nate Bittle | Oregon | 20 | 6:53 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 0.2 | 10.4 | 25.0%† | 53.8%† | 56.7%† |
| 2023 Nate Bittle | Oregon | 24 | 18:29 | 7.0 | 5.3 | 0.7 | 15.1 | 31.3%† | 66.0% | 58.1% |
| 2024 Nate Bittle | Oregon | 5Few games | 17:15 | 10.0 | 4.4 | 0.8 | 23.2 | 33.3%† | 72.7%† | 57.0%† |
| 2025 Nate Bittle | Oregon | 35 | 27:42 | 14.2 | 7.6 | 1.9 | 20.5 | 33.6% | 81.1% | 60.4% |
| 2026 Nate Bittle | Oregon | 25 | 31:01 | 16.8 | 6.9 | 2.6 | 21.6 | 31.9% | 73.2% | 56.9% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Oregon · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $780K
- 80% range $455K to $1.70M
- Median share of team pool
- 21.2%
- team pool $3.55M, 80% range $2.55M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $780K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $23K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 59.9%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Oregon: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Oregon | $780Kspeculative | $455K to $1.70M | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +3.7 | +2.6 to +4.7 | Sufficient evidence | +1.6 | +2.2 | +4.6range +4.2 to +5.0 | 2,478 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Oregon | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +5.3 | +4.1 to +6.7 | Sufficient evidence | +2.1 | +3.3 | +6.4range +5.8 to +7.3 | 3,409 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Oregon | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +2.0 | +0.8 to +2.9 | Limited evidence | +1.1 | +1.0 | +0.4range +0.4 to +0.5 | 326 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail | |
| 2023 | Oregon | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +2.4 | +1.2 to +3.3 | Sufficient evidence | +0.3 | +2.0 | +2.2range +1.8 to +2.5 | 1,338 | Season detail | |
| 2022 | Oregon | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +1.2 | +0.4 to +1.9 | Limited evidence | +0.1 | +1.1 | Not computed for this season | 393 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology