Cameron Sheffield
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1762:19 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 104
- Minutes per game
- 16:57
- Points per game
- 4.2
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.1 / 0.7
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 4.2 | 3.1 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 1.2 |
| Per 40 minutes | 9.9 | 7.3 | 1.7 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 1.5 | 2.9 |
| Season totals | 437 | 320 | 73 | 41 | 17 | 68 | 129 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 125–325 | 38.5% | 3.1 | 7.4 |
| 2P | 53–124 | 42.7% | 1.2 | 2.8 |
| 3P | 72–201 | 35.8% | 1.9 | 4.6 |
| FT | 115–160 | 71.9% | 1.5 | 3.6 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49.5% | 55.3% | 61.8% | 49.2% | 1.07 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Cameron Sheffield | Rice | 24 | 17:46 | 4.8 | 2.6 | 1.0 | 10.9 | 39.6%† | 68.6% | 56.6%† |
| 2022 Cameron Sheffield | Rice | 25 | 15:37 | 3.7 | 2.8 | 0.4 | 9.5 | 35.6%† | 69.7% | 51.4%† |
| 2023 Cameron Sheffield | Rice | 28 | 31:29 | 7.7 | 6.3 | 1.2 | 9.8 | 35.4% | 76.4% | 58.8% |
| 2025 Cameron Sheffield | Duke | 12Under 100 minutes | 2:06 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 7.9 | 20.0%† | 50.0%† | 32.2%† |
| 2026 Cameron Sheffield | Duke | 15Under 100 minutes | 2:34 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 8.3 | 28.6%† | — | 33.3%† |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Duke · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $29K
- 80% range $16K to $46K
- Median share of team pool
- 0.8%
- team pool $3.55M, 80% range $2.60M to $4.90M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $29K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $29K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 2.6%
- Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
- Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Duke: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Not applicable | $29Kspeculative, floor only | $16K to $46K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
| 2025 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
| 2023 | Rice | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.3 | -0.6 to +1.2 | Sufficient evidence | +0.5 | -0.3 | +3.1range +2.6 to +3.6 | 2,916 | Season detail | |
| 2022 | Rice | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -0.5 | -1.8 to +0.7 | Sufficient evidence | -0.1 | -0.4 | Not computed for this season | 1,321 | ||
| 2021 | Rice | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -0.9 | -2.2 to +0.3 | Sufficient evidence | +0.5 | -1.4 | Not computed for this season | 1,343 | 2020-21 season, shortened by COVID-19 cancellations; kept in the model fit with this flag. | |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology