Nikola Dzepina
Washington · 2025–26 · 14 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
151:05 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 14
- Minutes per game
- 10:48
- Points per game
- 2.6
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 1.3 / 0.7
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 2.6 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 1.2 |
| Per 40 minutes | 9.8 | 4.8 | 2.6 | 0.0 | 3.2 | 0.5 | 4.5 |
| Season totals | 37 | 18 | 10 | 0 | 12 | 2 | 17 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 13–43 | 30.2%† | 3.1 | 11.4 |
| 2P | 4–7 | 57.1%† | 0.5 | 1.9 |
| 3P | 9–36 | 25.0%† | 2.6 | 9.5 |
| FT | 2–4 | 50.0%† | 0.3 | 1.1 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 40.7%† | 41.3%† | 83.7%† | 9.3%† | 5.00 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25); the field-goal floor applies to the derived rates above. Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Washington · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $57K
- 80% range $22K to $105K
- Median share of team pool
- 1.7%
- team pool $3.55M, 80% range $2.60M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $57K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $25K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 11.9%
- Limited evidence
- Limited evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Washington: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Washington | $57Kspeculative | $22K to $105K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -0.3 | -1.2 to +0.7 | Limited evidence | +0.4 | -0.7 | +0.7range +0.6 to +0.8 | 524 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 18:14 | 10:48 | 0:58–25:09 | |
| Points | 3.4 | 2.6 | 0.0–7.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 39.6% | 39.8% | 0.0%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-12 | Wisconsin | L 82–85 | 10:33 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-03-11 | Southern California | W 83–79 | 12:34 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-03-07 | Oregon | L 79–85 | 19:05 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-4 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 37.5% |
| 2026-03-04 | Southern California | W 91–72 | 25:09 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 2-7 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 35.7% |
| 2026-02-28 | Wisconsin | L 73–90 | 23:48 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 75.0% |
| 2026-02-24 | Rutgers | W 79–72 | 6:01 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | Minnesota | W 69–57 | 1:54 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-2 | — |
| 2026-01-21 | Nebraska | L 66–76 | 0:58 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-14 | Michigan | L 72–82 | 3:10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-11 | Ohio St. | W 81–74 | 10:43 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-07 | Purdue | L 73–81 | 9:38 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-5 | 0-5 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-29 | Utah | W 74–65 | 3:59 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-22 | San Diego | W 86–56 | 19:20 | 7 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2-7 | 1-5 | 2-2 | 35.7% |
| 2025-12-13 | Southern Utah | W 105–69 | 4:13 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2-3 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 83.3% |