Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Taj Walters

NIU · 2025–26 · 26 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season

Logged performance

742:04 minutes logged

Games logged
26
Minutes per game
28:32
Points per game
8.5
Rebounds / assists per game
5.5 / 0.6
Box line on three bases
BasisPtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF
Per game8.55.50.60.80.41.32.1
Per 40 minutes11.97.80.81.10.51.93.0
Season totals2211441520103555
Shooting with attempts
ShotMade–att.PctAtt/GAtt/40
FG76–17643.2%6.89.5
2P48–10247.1%3.95.5
3P28–7437.8%2.84.0
FT41–5475.9%2.12.9
Derived rates (computed here from the box line, not published statistics)
eFG%Estimated TS%3PA / FGAFTA / FGAAST / TO
51.1%55.3%42.0%30.7%0.43

Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions

Speculative compensation · 2025–26β

No speculative compensation is published for this player's team: it has no modelled men's basketball pool or no player value records.

No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

No calculator for this team.

Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ

No model-implied value is published for this player: fewer than 300 on-court possessions in every season, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit.

Seasons played, with no model-implied value published
SeasonTeamSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% rangeSplit roleValue
2026Not applicabledescriptive: not used in fit or gatesNo model-implied value is published.

NIL methodology

Game log

Game log, box line per game. eFG% is computed for the game from field goals and three-pointers; it is blank without a field-goal attempt.
DateOpponentResultMinPtsRebAstStlBlkTOPFFG3PFTeFG
2026-03-06AkronL 55–9435:3095101133-101-62-235.0%
2026-03-03Kent St.L 76–10227:4884200333-72-60-057.1%
2026-02-28Ball St.L 43–7932:2684001202-91-43-427.8%
2026-02-24ToledoL 69–7931:38115101054-62-31-283.3%
2026-02-21OhioL 66–7439:57108020214-112-30-045.5%
2026-02-17BuffaloW 72–7040:00118131334-92-31-155.6%
2026-02-14Central Mich.L 46–8821:55101010323-71-43-450.0%
2026-02-11Bowling GreenL 52–6828:2482000023-61-11-258.3%
2026-02-07Georgia St.W 75–7431:51128100103-101-45-535.0%
2026-01-31Miami (OH)L 61–8531:49173120047-131-22-357.7%
2026-01-27Western Mich.W 85–6530:03168120137-122-50-066.7%
2026-01-24Ball St.L 53–5834:1097100024-71-40-064.3%
2026-01-20OhioL 77–8033:3394110332-41-24-462.5%
2026-01-17MassachusettsW 70–6838:4558221331-60-33-416.7%
2026-01-13Eastern Mich.L 59–7736:181310010125-132-51-246.2%
2026-01-06ToledoL 61–7536:16813002213-41-21-187.5%
2026-01-03Kent St.L 73–7734:301311031324-93-42-261.1%
2025-12-31BuffaloL 67–8129:54133001023-51-26-670.0%
2025-12-20Central Mich.W 74–7329:23135100125-81-22-268.8%
2025-12-13ElonL 79–8521:1654200052-31-20-083.3%
2025-12-06BradleyL 55–8421:0826010121-40-10-425.0%
2025-12-02LindenwoodL 64–9917:1103001120-30-20-20.0%
2025-11-25Austin PeayL 59–7720:2323010101-10-00-0100.0%
2025-11-21Loyola ChicagoW 76–5922:23910010102-81-44-431.3%
2025-11-10Grand CanyonL 59–887:5101000220-10-00-00.0%
2025-11-07WisconsinL 72–977:4200000010-00-00-0—