K'Jei Parker
Massachusetts · 2025–26 · 32 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
666:11 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 32
- Minutes per game
- 20:49
- Points per game
- 10.9
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.0 / 1.9
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 10.9 | 2.0 | 1.9 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 2.0 |
| Per 40 minutes | 21.0 | 3.8 | 3.7 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 2.6 | 3.8 |
| Season totals | 350 | 63 | 62 | 20 | 0 | 43 | 64 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 117–259 | 45.2% | 8.1 | 15.6 |
| 2P | 53–105 | 50.5% | 3.3 | 6.3 |
| 3P | 64–154 | 41.6% | 4.8 | 9.2 |
| FT | 52–58 | 89.7% | 1.8 | 3.5 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 57.5% | 61.5% | 59.5% | 22.4% | 1.44 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Massachusetts · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $16K
- 80% range $2K to $63K
- Median share of team pool
- 5.9%
- team pool $365K, 80% range $135K to $965K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $15K to $16K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $3K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 50.3%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Massachusetts: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Massachusetts | $16Kspeculative | $2K to $63K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -0.6 | -1.9 to +0.7 | Sufficient evidence | +1.4 | -2.0 | +3.4range +2.9 to +3.9 | 2,119 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Florida A&M | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -4.0 | -5.1 to -2.9 | Sufficient evidence | -2.2 | -1.8 | +0.7range +0.2 to +1.1 | 2,160 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 16:35 | 20:49 | 4:48–33:12 | |
| Points | 5.6 | 10.9 | 0.0–31.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 43.3% | 53.3% | 0.0%–107.1% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-13 | Toledo | L 67–77 | 17:30 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-6 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2026-03-12 | Miami (OH) | W 87–83 | 9:18 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2026-03-03 | Ohio | W 94–82 | 19:36 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2-5 | 1-3 | 4-4 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | Bowling Green | L 62–81 | 18:12 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-24 | Ball St. | L 73–74 | 18:19 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4-10 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | Buffalo | L 82–86 | 30:07 | 12 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 5-10 | 2-7 | 0-0 | 60.0% |
| 2026-02-17 | Miami (OH) | L 77–86 | 18:52 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2026-02-13 | Akron | L 92–99 | 25:59 | 20 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 7-15 | 5-10 | 1-2 | 63.3% |
| 2026-02-07 | Coastal Carolina | L 91–94 | 33:12 | 31 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 12-18 | 4-6 | 3-6 | 77.8% |
| 2026-02-03 | Central Mich. | W 95–89 | 12:50 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0-5 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-31 | Eastern Mich. | W 70–67 | 17:39 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1-8 | 0-4 | 4-4 | 12.5% |
| 2026-01-27 | Miami (OH) | L 84–86 | 23:53 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3-8 | 1-2 | 3-3 | 43.8% |
| 2026-01-23 | Buffalo | W 68–67 | 17:47 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-6 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 16.7% |
| 2026-01-20 | Toledo | W 84–82 | 18:57 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4-7 | 4-6 | 1-2 | 85.7% |
| 2026-01-17 | NIU | L 68–70 | 22:22 | 15 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5-12 | 3-6 | 2-2 | 54.2% |
| 2026-01-13 | Western Mich. | W 85–82 | 18:34 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6-11 | 4-7 | 4-4 | 72.7% |
| 2026-01-10 | Ball St. | W 79–71 | 19:27 | 14 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4-9 | 2-6 | 4-4 | 55.6% |
| 2026-01-06 | Ohio | L 83–86 | 21:26 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3-7 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-03 | Bowling Green | L 100–101 | 27:26 | 21 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6-9 | 5-8 | 4-4 | 94.4% |
| 2025-12-30 | Eastern Mich. | L 74–80 | 20:07 | 14 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5-12 | 4-8 | 0-0 | 58.3% |
| 2025-12-20 | Kent St. | L 59–69 | 23:12 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 75.0% |
| 2025-12-13 | Florida St. | W 103–95 | 25:00 | 24 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 7-11 | 6-9 | 4-4 | 90.9% |
| 2025-12-10 | Boston College | W 76–74 | 21:47 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3-9 | 1-4 | 1-2 | 38.9% |
| 2025-12-06 | UMass Lowell | W 80–60 | 24:01 | 12 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 5-13 | 2-8 | 0-0 | 46.2% |
| 2025-12-03 | Harvard | W 78–71 | 6:22 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3-4 | 2-3 | 2-2 | 100.0% |
| 2025-11-24 | Oregon St. | W 73–65 | 4:48 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-22 | Green Bay | L 75–79 | 28:15 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2025-11-21 | Col. of Charleston | L 65–69 | 18:47 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3-7 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 57.1% |
| 2025-11-16 | Central Conn. St. | W 84–77 | 25:41 | 22 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 8-13 | 6-9 | 0-0 | 84.6% |
| 2025-11-13 | Le Moyne | W 94–80 | 25:07 | 19 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6-7 | 3-3 | 4-4 | 107.1% |
| 2025-11-08 | UAlbany | W 83–62 | 24:50 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3-11 | 2-7 | 4-4 | 36.4% |
| 2025-11-03 | Marshall | L 72–78 | 26:48 | 13 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 4-10 | 0-3 | 5-5 | 40.0% |