Javohn Garcia
McNeese · 2025–26 · 28 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season
Logged performance
846:25 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 28
- Minutes per game
- 30:14
- Points per game
- 11.8
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.1 / 1.5
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 11.8 | 3.1 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 1.9 |
| Per 40 minutes | 15.5 | 4.1 | 2.0 | 2.2 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 2.5 |
| Season totals | 329 | 87 | 43 | 46 | 21 | 17 | 53 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 115–253 | 45.5% | 9.0 | 12.0 |
| 2P | 79–153 | 51.6% | 5.5 | 7.2 |
| 3P | 36–100 | 36.0% | 3.6 | 4.7 |
| FT | 63–82 | 76.8% | 2.9 | 3.9 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52.6% | 56.9% | 39.5% | 32.4% | 2.53 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
McNeese St · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $41K
- 80% range $14K to $120K
- Median share of team pool
- 17.1%
- team pool $225K, 80% range $83K to $610K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $37K to $49K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 66.7%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
McNeese St: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | McNeese St | $41Kspeculative | $14K to $120K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +4.1 | +2.7 to +5.7 | Sufficient evidence | +1.5 | +2.5 | +5.4range +4.7 to +6.2 | 2,025 | Prior built from the box-score line only, without a prior-season value. Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 34:38 | 30:14 | 16:38–48:26 | |
| Points | 15.6 | 11.8 | 0.0–31.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 52.9% | 50.8% | 0.0%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-19 | Vanderbilt | L 68–78 | 37:19 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4-11 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 45.5% |
| 2026-03-11 | SFA | W 76–59 | 32:42 | 31 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 11-18 | 5-8 | 4-4 | 75.0% |
| 2026-03-10 | UTRGV | W 84–80 | 48:26 | 12 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5-13 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 38.5% |
| 2026-02-16 | Northwestern St. | W 75–64 | 32:17 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2-11 | 0-5 | 0-0 | 18.2% |
| 2026-02-14 | East Texas A&M | W 97–54 | 22:25 | 21 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8-12 | 5-8 | 0-0 | 87.5% |
| 2026-02-09 | Houston Christian | W 73–69 | 36:01 | 18 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8-14 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 60.7% |
| 2026-02-07 | UIW | W 81–64 | 23:17 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2-6 | 0-2 | 4-5 | 33.3% |
| 2026-02-02 | SFA | L 60–67 | 25:24 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1-5 | 0-3 | 2-2 | 20.0% |
| 2026-01-31 | Lamar University | W 64–63 | 32:49 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1-9 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 16.7% |
| 2026-01-27 | Southeastern La. | W 76–66 | 29:18 | 13 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4-6 | 2-2 | 3-5 | 83.3% |
| 2026-01-24 | LSU New Orleans | W 82–63 | 27:53 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2-8 | 0-3 | 2-2 | 25.0% |
| 2026-01-19 | A&M-Corpus Christi | W 69–53 | 32:46 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 4-8 | 33.3% |
| 2026-01-17 | UTRGV | L 76–79 | 36:11 | 19 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7-13 | 2-6 | 3-3 | 61.5% |
| 2026-01-12 | Nicholls | W 94–68 | 27:07 | 12 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4-9 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 66.7% |
| 2026-01-10 | Southeastern La. | W 73–61 | 16:38 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3-4 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-05 | SFA | W 66–64 | 35:57 | 8 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4-10 | 0-3 | 0-1 | 40.0% |
| 2026-01-02 | Lamar University | W 82–70 | 32:39 | 15 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4-9 | 0-3 | 7-11 | 44.4% |
| 2025-12-29 | Michigan | L 71–112 | 27:29 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3-8 | 0-3 | 0-1 | 37.5% |
| 2025-12-15 | Houston Christian | W 78–68 | 32:09 | 11 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5-8 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 68.8% |
| 2025-12-12 | East Texas A&M | W 102–66 | 20:51 | 11 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5-9 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 61.1% |
| 2025-12-09 | Rhode Island | W 66–64 | 35:02 | 13 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4-9 | 1-3 | 4-4 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-05 | Northwestern St. | W 92–54 | 25:37 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3-8 | 2-3 | 1-2 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-01 | UIW | L 67–71 | 33:02 | 13 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4-7 | 1-3 | 4-4 | 64.3% |
| 2025-11-25 | Middle Tenn. | W 72–62 | 30:45 | 26 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8-11 | 2-3 | 8-8 | 81.8% |
| 2025-11-24 | Murray St. | W 73–60 | 30:52 | 15 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 5-10 | 1-3 | 4-7 | 55.0% |
| 2025-11-23 | George Washington | W 92–86 | 32:44 | 18 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5-14 | 2-5 | 6-7 | 42.9% |
| 2025-11-14 | Louisiana | W 88–62 | 28:06 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2-4 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 62.5% |
| 2025-11-07 | Santa Clara | L 67–79 | 20:39 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0.0% |