Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Rokas Jocius

LMU (CA) · 2025–26 · 31 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season

Logged performance

389:37 minutes logged

Games logged
31
Minutes per game
12:34
Points per game
3.2
Rebounds / assists per game
2.9 / 0.3
Box line on three bases
BasisPtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF
Per game3.22.90.30.20.30.72.0
Per 40 minutes10.29.31.00.71.02.26.3
Season totals9991107102161
Shooting with attempts
ShotMade–att.PctAtt/GAtt/40
FG40–7454.1%†2.47.6
2P33–5856.9%†1.96.0
3P7–1643.8%†0.51.6
FT12–2352.2%†0.72.4
Derived rates (computed here from the box line, not published statistics)
eFG%Estimated TS%3PA / FGAFTA / FGAAST / TO
58.8%†58.8%†21.6%†31.1%†0.48

Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25); the field-goal floor applies to the derived rates above. Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions

Speculative compensation · 2025–26β

No speculative compensation is published for this player's team: it has no modelled men's basketball pool or no player value records.

No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

No calculator for this team.

Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ

No model-implied value is published for this player: fewer than 300 on-court possessions in every season, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit.

Seasons played, with no model-implied value published
SeasonTeamSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% rangeSplit roleValue
2026Not applicabledescriptive: not used in fit or gatesNo model-implied value is published.

NIL methodology

Game log

Game log, box line per game. eFG% is computed for the game from field goals and three-pointers; it is blank without a field-goal attempt.
DateOpponentResultMinPtsRebAstStlBlkTOPFFG3PFTeFG
2026-03-05San DiegoL 62–666:2500000020-00-00-0—
2026-02-28Seattle UL 66–717:0232000041-20-01-150.0%
2026-02-25Washington St.W 67–666:3302001000-00-00-0—
2026-02-21San DiegoW 77–659:3822010111-10-00-0100.0%
2026-02-14PepperdineL 89–9024:20711110243-81-20-043.8%
2026-02-11PacificL 59–654:4501000140-00-00-0—
2026-02-07San DiegoW 83–632:2800000000-00-00-0—
2026-02-04San FranciscoW 84–754:1802000110-10-00-00.0%
2026-01-31Santa ClaraL 73–1046:4601010000-10-00-00.0%
2026-01-28Oregon St.L 69–725:1600000000-00-00-0—
2026-01-21Seattle UL 59–699:3722000011-10-00-0100.0%
2026-01-17PortlandL 58–7112:4897000103-61-22-258.3%
2026-01-14Oregon St.L 70–7615:1166000323-30-00-0100.0%
2026-01-10Santa ClaraL 72–10313:1842000012-30-00-166.7%
2026-01-08San FranciscoW 84–829:0000002030-10-00-00.0%
2026-01-04GonzagaL 47–8220:4367100213-50-00-060.0%
2026-01-02Washington St.L 76–7815:5923000121-30-00-033.3%
2025-12-30PacificW 80–7112:4333101131-21-20-275.0%
2025-12-28Saint Mary's (CA)L 73–7828:3623102031-40-20-025.0%
2025-12-23Morgan St.W 83–5616:1922100111-30-00-133.3%
2025-12-19North Ala.W 91–5717:4237302151-21-10-075.0%
2025-12-16UC San DiegoL 57–6714:3354001012-31-10-083.3%
2025-12-02Saint LouisL 70–9120:3342120132-50-10-040.0%
2025-11-28Stony BrookL 68–7124:14228010226-71-29-1092.9%
2025-11-25OhioW 70–589:0261100043-40-00-075.0%
2025-11-24Fla. AtlanticL 65–7618:4273010043-41-10-087.5%
2025-11-17UC Santa BarbaraW 78–7424:0003000120-20-10-10.0%
2025-11-14TroyW 74–6315:0944001022-20-00-3100.0%
2025-11-11UTEPW 71–582:3200000120-00-00-0—
2025-11-08Ark.-Pine BluffW 94–723:0601000000-00-00-2—
2025-11-05Eastern Wash.W 70–628:1902000130-10-10-00.0%