Hayden Tibbits

St. Thomas (MN) · 2025–26 · 23 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season

Logged performance

211:36 minutes logged

Games logged: 23
Minutes per game: 9:12
Points per game: 2.7
Rebounds / assists per game: 1.0 / 0.7

Box line on three bases
Basis	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF
Per game	2.7	1.0	0.7	0.3	0.0	0.3	0.3
Per 40 minutes	11.7	4.2	3.2	1.5	0.2	1.5	1.5
Season totals	62	22	17	8	1	8	8

Shooting with attempts
Shot	Made–att.	Pct	Att/G	Att/40
FG	20–45	44.4%†	2.0	8.5
2P	8–14	57.1%†	0.6	2.6
3P	12–31	38.7%†	1.3	5.9
FT	10–19	52.6%†	0.8	3.6

Derived rates (computed here from the box line, not published statistics)
eFG%	Estimated TS%	3PA / FGA	FTA / FGA	AST / TO
57.8%†	58.1%†	68.9%†	42.2%†	2.13

Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25); the field-goal floor applies to the derived rates above. Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions

Speculative compensation · 2025–26β

No speculative compensation is published for this player's team: it has no modelled men's basketball pool or no player value records.

No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

No calculator for this team.

Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ

No model-implied value is published for this player: fewer than 300 on-court possessions in every season, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit.

Seasons played, with no model-implied value published
Season	Team	Speculative compensation (best guess)	Compensation 80% range	Split role	Value
2026	Not applicable	descriptive: not used in fit or gates	No model-implied value is published.

NIL methodology

Game log

Trend over the 23 listed games, oldest to newest. Horizontal position follows the date. Minutes and points start at zero; game eFG% scales to its own range. Each row has its own vertical scale, so compare the printed values, not the graphics. Faint line: five-game rolling mean.
Measure	Last five	Listed games	Range
Minutes	7:44	9:12	0:16–24:18
Points	2.4	2.7	0.0–9.0
Game eFG%	60.7%	45.1%	0.0%–125.0%

Game log, box line per game. eFG% is computed for the game from field goals and three-pointers; it is blank without a field-goal attempt.
Date	Opponent	Result	Min	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	FG	3P	FT	eFG
2026-03-17	Seattle U	L 52–67	10:12	3	1	0	1	0	1	0	1-2	1-2	0-0	75.0%
2026-03-07	North Dakota	L 66–67	7:55	2	0	0	0	0	0	1	1-3	0-2	0-2	33.3%
2026-03-05	South Dakota St.	W 80–67	0:16	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
2026-02-28	Omaha	W 68–53	5:33	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0-2	0-1	0-0	0.0%
2026-02-26	North Dakota St.	W 84–62	14:45	7	3	1	0	0	0	0	3-5	1-3	0-0	70.0%
2026-02-21	Denver	L 80–82	10:26	5	1	1	0	0	0	0	2-2	1-1	0-0	125.0%
2026-02-14	Kansas City	W 104–64	24:18	7	1	3	2	0	0	0	2-4	2-4	1-3	75.0%
2026-02-12	Omaha	L 94–98	20:51	9	1	2	2	0	1	1	3-5	2-4	1-2	80.0%
2026-02-07	Oral Roberts	W 92–75	20:32	4	3	2	1	0	0	2	1-3	1-2	1-2	50.0%
2026-02-04	South Dakota St.	W 77–62	22:37	8	2	0	0	0	1	0	3-4	2-3	0-0	100.0%
2026-02-01	Kansas City	W 99–64	18:11	5	3	3	0	1	1	0	2-5	1-3	0-0	50.0%
2026-01-22	South Dakota St.	W 74–69	2:00	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
2026-01-15	North Dakota	W 91–80	9:21	2	1	1	0	0	0	1	0-1	0-1	2-4	0.0%
2026-01-07	South Dakota	W 99–86	1:51	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0-0	0-0	2-2	—
2025-12-20	UC Riverside	W 92–78	0:41	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
2025-12-13	UNC Asheville	W 80–59	1:00	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
2025-12-07	Weber St.	W 88–65	1:19	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0-1	0-0	2-2	0.0%
2025-12-03	Montana St.	L 74–82	10:27	1	2	0	0	0	1	1	0-2	0-2	1-2	0.0%
2025-11-23	Portland	W 76–66	1:25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0-1	0-0	0-0	0.0%
2025-11-22	Cal St. Fullerton	L 80–88	12:59	5	1	0	1	0	0	2	2-4	1-2	0-0	62.5%
2025-11-13	Green Bay	W 80–61	9:16	0	0	3	1	0	3	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
2025-11-10	Washington St.	L 71–81	4:23	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
2025-11-03	Saint Mary's (CA)	L 58–84	1:18	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0-1	0-1	0-0	0.0%