Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Filip Brankovic

UTRGV · 2025–26 · 31 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season

Logged performance

760:15 minutes logged

Games logged
31
Minutes per game
24:31
Points per game
13.3
Rebounds / assists per game
4.5 / 1.9
Box line on three bases
BasisPtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF
Per game13.34.51.90.40.41.62.4
Per 40 minutes21.77.43.10.70.72.63.9
Season totals4131415913134975
Shooting with attempts
ShotMade–att.PctAtt/GAtt/40
FG161–30652.6%9.916.1
2P126–20262.4%6.510.6
3P35–10433.7%3.45.5
FT56–6783.6%2.23.5
Derived rates (computed here from the box line, not published statistics)
eFG%Estimated TS%3PA / FGAFTA / FGAAST / TO
58.3%61.6%34.0%21.9%1.20

Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions

Speculative compensation · 2025–26β

No speculative compensation is published for this player's team: it has no modelled men's basketball pool or no player value records.

No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

No calculator for this team.

Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ

No model-implied value is published for this player: fewer than 300 on-court possessions in every season, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit.

Seasons played, with no model-implied value published
SeasonTeamSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% rangeSplit roleValue
2026Not applicabledescriptive: not used in fit or gatesNo model-implied value is published.

NIL methodology

Game log

Game log, box line per game. eFG% is computed for the game from field goals and three-pointers; it is blank without a field-goal attempt.
DateOpponentResultMinPtsRebAstStlBlkTOPFFG3PFTeFG
2026-03-10McNeeseL 80–8438:00117411354-122-51-141.7%
2026-03-09NichollsW 86–6824:43215310029-120-23-375.0%
2026-03-02Northwestern St.W 74–6221:0343200232-60-10-033.3%
2026-02-28East Texas A&MW 63–5527:57139400315-101-32-355.0%
2026-02-23McNeeseL 68–7530:12153100227-111-40-068.2%
2026-02-21Southeastern La.W 96–7517:39183300036-72-34-4100.0%
2026-02-16Lamar UniversityW 70–6526:17194202028-163-80-159.4%
2026-02-14SFAL 57–6627:10103101215-130-60-038.5%
2026-02-09NichollsW 92–7227:16164300316-100-34-460.0%
2026-02-07LSU New OrleansW 95–7623:34245210128-132-56-669.2%
2026-02-02Houston ChristianW 74–5721:46175200006-91-24-572.2%
2026-01-31UIWW 106–9320:48155011134-71-36-764.3%
2026-01-26A&M-Corpus ChristiW 64–5510:2333100341-60-21-216.7%
2026-01-24Houston ChristianW 68–5125:34121200134-82-32-262.5%
2026-01-19Southeastern La.W 68–6523:42135400016-120-21-250.0%
2026-01-17McNeeseW 79–7623:2753311132-41-20-062.5%
2026-01-12Northwestern St.L 63–6423:50192100446-103-64-475.0%
2026-01-10East Texas A&ML 69–7731:04167011216-120-34-550.0%
2026-01-05UIWW 80–6733:582993212210-163-76-771.9%
2026-01-03A&M-Corpus ChristiL 59–6322:40144111247-110-20-163.6%
2025-12-31NichollsL 69–7130:53145202345-140-44-435.7%
2025-12-29LSU New OrleansL 69–8525:02124200025-72-30-085.7%
2025-12-16Lamar UniversityW 83–7223:21188410238-132-30-069.2%
2025-12-11UT ArlingtonL 50–5828:0096330403-91-62-238.9%
2025-12-07Austin PeayW 63–5017:3264000223-70-20-042.9%
2025-12-03SFAL 60–7321:1322000011-60-10-016.7%
2025-11-24IllinoisL 73–8723:46155100115-103-42-465.0%
2025-11-22Missouri St.L 67–7424:08114101335-61-10-091.7%
2025-11-11Boise St.L 65–8519:4471100253-51-20-070.0%
2025-11-08Southern UtahW 95–7224:43117200035-101-20-055.0%
2025-11-03BaylorL 81–9620:50145101046-142-40-050.0%