Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Dane Christensen

UTRGV · 2025–26 · 25 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season

Logged performance

322:06 minutes logged

Games logged
25
Minutes per game
12:53
Points per game
2.9
Rebounds / assists per game
1.8 / 0.8
Box line on three bases
BasisPtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF
Per game2.91.80.80.30.10.61.5
Per 40 minutes8.95.62.51.00.21.74.6
Season totals724520821437
Shooting with attempts
ShotMade–att.PctAtt/GAtt/40
FG24–6735.8%†2.78.3
2P12–2842.9%†1.13.5
3P12–3930.8%†1.64.8
FT12–2254.5%†0.92.7
Derived rates (computed here from the box line, not published statistics)
eFG%Estimated TS%3PA / FGAFTA / FGAAST / TO
44.8%†46.9%†58.2%†32.8%†1.43

Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25); the field-goal floor applies to the derived rates above. Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions

Speculative compensation · 2025–26β

No speculative compensation is published for this player's team: it has no modelled men's basketball pool or no player value records.

No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

No calculator for this team.

Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ

No model-implied value is published for this player: fewer than 300 on-court possessions in every season, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit.

Seasons played, with no model-implied value published
SeasonTeamSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% rangeSplit roleValue
2026Not applicabledescriptive: not used in fit or gatesNo model-implied value is published.

NIL methodology

Game log

Game log, box line per game. eFG% is computed for the game from field goals and three-pointers; it is blank without a field-goal attempt.
DateOpponentResultMinPtsRebAstStlBlkTOPFFG3PFTeFG
2026-03-10McNeeseL 80–8416:0804000130-10-10-00.0%
2026-03-09NichollsW 86–6816:0820101021-30-00-033.3%
2026-03-02Northwestern St.W 74–6214:1544010011-20-02-250.0%
2026-02-28East Texas A&MW 63–5515:0443000121-21-11-275.0%
2026-02-23McNeeseL 68–7519:2873111352-21-12-4125.0%
2026-02-21Southeastern La.W 96–7513:09123200004-42-22-2125.0%
2026-02-16Lamar UniversityW 70–6512:4220200010-30-32-20.0%
2026-02-14SFAL 57–6610:5003200000-00-00-0—
2026-02-09NichollsW 92–7214:1102100030-20-10-00.0%
2026-02-07LSU New OrleansW 95–7618:0084000023-32-20-0133.3%
2026-02-02Houston ChristianW 74–576:2301100010-00-00-0—
2026-01-31UIWW 106–933:4521000101-20-10-050.0%
2026-01-26A&M-Corpus ChristiW 64–5515:5400210010-30-30-00.0%
2026-01-19Southeastern La.W 68–652:4800000000-10-10-20.0%
2025-12-31NichollsL 69–714:3100000000-00-00-0—
2025-12-29LSU New OrleansL 69–859:1021110101-20-10-050.0%
2025-12-16Lamar UniversityW 83–724:1530000001-11-10-0150.0%
2025-12-11UT ArlingtonL 50–587:0900000000-20-10-00.0%
2025-12-07Austin PeayW 63–5014:0701100220-20-20-00.0%
2025-12-03SFAL 60–7314:1970100132-51-42-450.0%
2025-11-24IllinoisL 73–8710:5103010000-30-10-00.0%
2025-11-22Missouri St.L 67–7411:0902300030-20-10-00.0%
2025-11-11Boise St.L 65–8530:1134010221-60-21-416.7%
2025-11-08Southern UtahW 95–7220:01116110124-83-50-068.8%
2025-11-03BaylorL 81–9617:3850110142-81-50-031.3%