Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Always Wright

UTRGV · 2025–26 · 31 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season

Logged performance

466:31 minutes logged

Games logged
31
Minutes per game
15:03
Points per game
2.8
Rebounds / assists per game
1.6 / 1.8
Box line on three bases
BasisPtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF
Per game2.81.61.80.30.11.30.9
Per 40 minutes7.54.44.70.90.23.42.5
Season totals8751551024029
Shooting with attempts
ShotMade–att.PctAtt/GAtt/40
FG34–9037.8%†2.97.7
2P28–6145.9%†2.05.2
3P6–2920.7%†0.92.5
FT13–2259.1%†0.71.9
Derived rates (computed here from the box line, not published statistics)
eFG%Estimated TS%3PA / FGAFTA / FGAAST / TO
41.1%†43.6%†32.2%†24.4%†1.38

Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25); the field-goal floor applies to the derived rates above. Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions

Speculative compensation · 2025–26β

No speculative compensation is published for this player's team: it has no modelled men's basketball pool or no player value records.

No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

No calculator for this team.

Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ

No model-implied value is published for this player: fewer than 300 on-court possessions in every season, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit.

Seasons played, with no model-implied value published
SeasonTeamSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% rangeSplit roleValue
2026Not applicabledescriptive: not used in fit or gatesNo model-implied value is published.

NIL methodology

Game log

Game log, box line per game. eFG% is computed for the game from field goals and three-pointers; it is blank without a field-goal attempt.
DateOpponentResultMinPtsRebAstStlBlkTOPFFG3PFTeFG
2026-03-10McNeeseL 80–8418:4400100100-10-10-00.0%
2026-03-09NichollsW 86–6812:0001300230-00-00-0—
2026-03-02Northwestern St.W 74–6212:0941100002-30-10-066.7%
2026-02-28East Texas A&MW 63–556:1300000000-10-00-00.0%
2026-02-23McNeeseL 68–7515:4401100120-00-00-0—
2026-02-21Southeastern La.W 96–7518:0601300100-00-00-0—
2026-02-16Lamar UniversityW 70–6510:0842010121-31-11-250.0%
2026-02-14SFAL 57–666:3222000001-20-00-050.0%
2026-02-09NichollsW 92–727:2531000001-21-10-175.0%
2026-02-07LSU New OrleansW 95–7616:3642100021-50-12-220.0%
2026-02-02Houston ChristianW 74–576:1000200110-10-10-00.0%
2026-01-31UIWW 106–937:1121100001-20-00-050.0%
2026-01-26A&M-Corpus ChristiW 64–556:4722200001-10-00-0100.0%
2026-01-24Houston ChristianW 68–518:3200200100-00-00-0—
2026-01-19Southeastern La.W 68–655:3801100100-10-10-00.0%
2026-01-17McNeeseW 79–769:0101100100-00-00-0—
2026-01-12Northwestern St.L 63–645:2201100200-00-00-0—
2026-01-10East Texas A&ML 69–7720:5834210221-41-30-037.5%
2026-01-05UIWW 80–6714:1901300110-30-20-00.0%
2026-01-03A&M-Corpus ChristiL 59–6312:2200000200-10-10-00.0%
2025-12-31NichollsL 69–7110:0902300300-50-20-00.0%
2025-12-29LSU New OrleansL 69–8526:1031200511-40-21-225.0%
2025-12-16Lamar UniversityW 83–7229:1693410213-50-13-460.0%
2025-12-11UT ArlingtonL 50–5824:1063310023-60-10-150.0%
2025-12-07Austin PeayW 63–5027:45105400313-70-24-542.9%
2025-12-03SFAL 60–7317:4042210002-30-10-066.7%
2025-11-24IllinoisL 73–8723:0383320143-92-30-044.4%
2025-11-22Missouri St.L 67–7420:4883000023-51-31-270.0%
2025-11-11Boise St.L 65–8521:1782110314-70-00-157.1%
2025-11-08Southern UtahW 95–7224:0144402322-60-00-033.3%
2025-11-03BaylorL 81–9622:1531420321-30-11-233.3%