Mark Drone
Texas St. · 2025–26 · 29 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
886:10 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 29
- Minutes per game
- 30:33
- Points per game
- 14.0
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.3 / 2.9
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 14.0 | 3.3 | 2.9 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 2.8 | 1.9 |
| Per 40 minutes | 18.3 | 4.4 | 3.8 | 1.3 | 0.1 | 3.7 | 2.4 |
| Season totals | 406 | 97 | 85 | 28 | 2 | 81 | 54 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 151–352 | 42.9% | 12.1 | 15.9 |
| 2P | 126–259 | 48.6% | 8.9 | 11.7 |
| 3P | 25–93 | 26.9% | 3.2 | 4.2 |
| FT | 79–95 | 83.2% | 3.3 | 4.3 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46.4% | 51.5% | 26.4% | 27.0% | 1.05 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Texas St · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $32K
- 80% range $4K to $105K
- Median share of team pool
- 12.3%
- team pool $335K, 80% range $125K to $895K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $27K to $34K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 71.6%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Texas St: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Texas St | $32Kspeculative | $4K to $105K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -0.3 | -1.1 to +0.5 | Sufficient evidence | -0.0 | -0.2 | +4.6range +4.1 to +5.1 | 2,452 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Texas St | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.3 | -0.2 to +0.9 | Sufficient evidence | +0.7 | -0.4 | +0.9range +0.8 to +1.1 | 630 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 33:30 | 30:33 | 10:44–43:51 | |
| Points | 15.8 | 14.0 | 0.0–24.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 44.7% | 45.3% | 0.0%–75.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-06 | Southern Miss. | L 77–81 | 35:04 | 19 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 6-17 | 0-2 | 7-8 | 35.3% |
| 2026-02-27 | App State | W 60–57 | 38:21 | 23 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 9-18 | 1-3 | 4-4 | 52.8% |
| 2026-02-21 | Louisiana | L 54–67 | 23:14 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 3-11 | 0-2 | 4-4 | 27.3% |
| 2026-02-19 | South Alabama | W 90–82 | 42:02 | 11 | 7 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 4-12 | 2-6 | 1-2 | 41.7% |
| 2026-02-14 | ULM | W 95–84 | 28:47 | 16 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 7-12 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 66.7% |
| 2026-02-11 | Troy | W 74–62 | 36:49 | 15 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 6-11 | 0-2 | 3-3 | 54.5% |
| 2026-02-07 | Western Mich. | W 77–61 | 33:54 | 20 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9-14 | 0-3 | 2-2 | 64.3% |
| 2026-02-04 | Ga. Southern | W 77–71 | 24:49 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 1-10 | 0-3 | 4-4 | 10.0% |
| 2026-01-31 | Old Dominion | W 81–64 | 38:06 | 12 | 7 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5-16 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 31.3% |
| 2026-01-28 | Marshall | W 72–68 | 34:15 | 17 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 6-12 | 2-4 | 3-4 | 58.3% |
| 2026-01-24 | James Madison | L 57–82 | 37:29 | 17 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5-19 | 1-6 | 6-7 | 28.9% |
| 2026-01-22 | Coastal Carolina | L 70–72 | 22:56 | 24 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 9-21 | 0-4 | 6-6 | 42.9% |
| 2026-01-17 | Southern Miss. | W 74–67 | 10:44 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-10 | Arkansas St. | L 82–83 | 12:06 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-08 | Southern Miss. | L 70–80 | 43:51 | 18 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 6-15 | 2-7 | 4-7 | 46.7% |
| 2026-01-03 | ULM | W 84–79 | 36:26 | 24 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 9-14 | 3-6 | 3-3 | 75.0% |
| 2025-12-31 | Troy | L 80–100 | 34:33 | 20 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 8-17 | 2-4 | 2-2 | 52.9% |
| 2025-12-20 | South Alabama | W 67–65 | 33:21 | 11 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 5-12 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 45.8% |
| 2025-12-17 | Arkansas St. | L 70–89 | 36:16 | 14 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5-11 | 1-4 | 3-4 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-10 | Southern U. | W 86–83 | 37:16 | 23 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 8-13 | 3-4 | 4-5 | 73.1% |
| 2025-12-03 | Rice | L 72–77 | 26:33 | 23 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 8-16 | 1-6 | 6-7 | 53.1% |
| 2025-11-29 | Lehigh | L 74–78 | 35:19 | 15 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6-14 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 42.9% |
| 2025-11-28 | Seattle U | L 52–66 | 29:50 | 10 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 5-11 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 45.5% |
| 2025-11-21 | Little Rock | W 65–56 | 31:38 | 13 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6-9 | 0-1 | 1-3 | 66.7% |
| 2025-11-18 · NCAA | Abilene Christian | W 63–49 | 29:36 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 2-10 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 20.0% |
| 2025-11-15 | Texas Southern | W 77–67 | 26:37 | 19 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 5-10 | 1-3 | 8-10 | 55.0% |
| 2025-11-12 | UTSA | W 80–69 | 14:53 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 33.3% |
| 2025-11-08 | Tulane | L 71–79 | 29:59 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 4-9 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 55.6% |
| 2025-11-03 | Bowling Green | L 48–83 | 21:26 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2-6 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 33.3% |