Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

St John's

2026 · descriptive season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for St John's, 2026: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Zuby Ejiofor75.2%+6.0range +4.7 to +7.1Sufficient evidence+8.9range +8.1 to +9.7Sufficient evidenceNot publishedNot published
Bryce Hopkins72.1%+4.8range +3.5 to +6.1Sufficient evidence+7.8range +6.9 to +8.6Sufficient evidenceNot publishedNot published
Oziyah Sellers71.5%+3.3range +2.1 to +4.6Sufficient evidence+6.8range +6.0 to +7.6Sufficient evidenceNot publishedNot published
Dillon Mitchell69.3%+5.3range +3.8 to +6.5Sufficient evidence+7.7range +6.8 to +8.5Sufficient evidenceNot publishedNot published
Joson Sanon51.9%-0.5range -1.9 to +0.6Sufficient evidence+3.2range +2.7 to +3.8Sufficient evidenceNot publishedNot published
Dylan Darling51.1%+4.6range +3.4 to +5.9Sufficient evidence+5.2range +4.6 to +5.8Sufficient evidenceNot publishedNot published
Ian Jackson44.8%+1.2range +0.0 to +2.4Sufficient evidence+3.4range +2.9 to +3.8Sufficient evidenceNot publishedNot published
Rubén Prey25.9%+3.6range +2.4 to +4.7Sufficient evidence+2.3range +2.1 to +2.6Sufficient evidenceNot publishedNot published
Sadiku Ibine Ayo16.3%+1.6range +0.9 to +2.3Sufficient evidence+1.2range +1.1 to +1.3Sufficient evidenceNot publishedNot published
Lefteris Liotopoulos14.4%+2.2range +1.1 to +3.1Sufficient evidence+1.1range +1.0 to +1.2Sufficient evidenceNot publishedNot published
Kelvin Odih4.0%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNot publishedNot published
Casper Pohto2.0%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNot publishedNot published
Handje Tamba1.1%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNot publishedNot published
Fotis Konstantinidis0.4%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNot publishedNot published

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

36 of 37 games passed lineup acceptance (97%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 1 of 37 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (alternate pairing to repo season 2026; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses

Reported revenue$31,994,396Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses$31,994,396Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
1 day4
2 days1
3 or more days31

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.5
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent0
Longest run of consecutive away games2

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology