Bowling Green
2026 · descriptive season · nil-value-v3 · Team results
Roster valuesβ
| Player | Possession share | Net and range | Wins above replacement and range | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Javontae Campbell | 88.8% | +2.5range +1.1 to +3.8Sufficient evidence | +7.0range +6.0 to +7.8Sufficient evidence | Loading | Loading |
| Sam Towns | 82.8% | +1.7range +0.2 to +3.1Sufficient evidence | +6.1range +5.2 to +6.9Sufficient evidence | Loading | Loading |
| Justin Thomas | 61.4% | +0.9range -0.3 to +2.1Sufficient evidence | +4.2range +3.6 to +4.7Sufficient evidence | Loading | Loading |
| Troy Glover II | 59.9% | +1.7range +0.8 to +2.8Sufficient evidence | +4.5range +4.0 to +5.1Sufficient evidence | Loading | Loading |
| Josiah Shackelford | 58.9% | -0.0range -1.5 to +1.7Sufficient evidence | +3.7range +3.0 to +4.4Sufficient evidence | Loading | Loading |
| Javon Ruffin | 58.4% | +1.5range +0.1 to +2.8Sufficient evidence | +4.3range +3.6 to +4.8Sufficient evidence | Loading | Loading |
| Mayar Wol | 49.9% | +0.3range -1.4 to +1.8Sufficient evidence | +3.2range +2.6 to +3.8Sufficient evidence | Loading | Loading |
| Aiden Goins | 15.5% | -0.8range -1.7 to +0.1Sufficient evidence | +0.9range +0.8 to +1.0Sufficient evidence | Loading | Loading |
| Makhi Leach | 13.8% | -0.7range -2.1 to +0.6Limited evidence | +0.8range +0.6 to +0.9Limited evidence | Loading | Loading |
| Camden Karel | 6.4% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | Loading | Loading |
| Jason Kimbrough Jr. | 3.0% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | Loading | Loading |
| Preston Squire | 0.7% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | Loading | Loading |
| Alijah Adem | 0.2% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | Loading | Loading |
| Mohamed Maxamud | 0.2% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | Loading | Loading |
| Christian Dedivanaj | 0.2% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | Loading | Loading |
Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.
Team pool and per-player compensation · 2025–26β
School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)
Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.
Coverage and exclusions
28 of 29 games passed lineup acceptance (97%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.
- 1 of 29 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team
Program revenueβ
EADA year 2024-25 (alternate pairing to repo season 2026; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expenses
| Reported revenue | $2,731,737 | Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output. |
|---|---|---|
| Reported expenses | $2,626,397 | Reported by the school. |
EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.
No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.
Schedule loadβ
Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.
Rest days before each game
| Rest days | Games |
|---|---|
| First game (no rest value) | 1 |
| 2 days | 1 |
| 3 or more days | 27 |
Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.
Load summary
| Mean games in prior 7 days | 1.3 |
|---|---|
| Games with fewer rest days than the opponent | 0 |
| Longest run of consecutive away games | 2 |
Association between rest and margin, all teams
Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41
This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.
Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology