Binghamton

2026 · descriptive season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for Binghamton, 2026: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
Player	Possession share	Net and range	Wins above replacement and range	Speculative compensation (best guess)	Compensation 80% range
Jeremiah Quigley	90.3%	-1.7range -2.6 to -0.7Sufficient evidence	+3.1range +2.8 to +3.4Sufficient evidence	$26KspeculativeLoading	$2K to $105KLoading
Wes Peterson	79.2%	-3.4range -4.4 to -2.3Sufficient evidence	+2.3range +1.8 to +2.6Sufficient evidence	$10KspeculativeLoading	$1K to $54KLoading
Jackson Benigni	72.9%	-1.4range -2.3 to -0.3Sufficient evidence	+2.7range +2.4 to +3.0Sufficient evidence	$32KspeculativeLoading	$2K to $145KLoading
Bryson Wilson	67.6%	-3.1range -4.2 to -2.0Sufficient evidence	+2.1range +1.7 to +2.4Sufficient evidence	$10KspeculativeLoading	$1K to $50KLoading
Zyier Beverly	56.2%	-1.6range -2.5 to -0.7Sufficient evidence	+2.1range +1.9 to +2.4Sufficient evidence	$19KspeculativeLoading	$2K to $84KLoading
Ryan Richardson	39.9%	-2.6range -3.3 to -1.9Sufficient evidence	+1.3range +1.1 to +1.6Sufficient evidence	$8KspeculativeLoading	$1K to $36KLoading
Stephan Snagg	39.8%	-0.9range -1.8 to +0.3Sufficient evidence	+1.7range +1.4 to +1.9Sufficient evidence	$27KspeculativeLoading	$4K to $155KLoading
Demetrius Lilley	34.4%	-1.7range -2.6 to -0.7Sufficient evidence	+1.3range +1.1 to +1.5Sufficient evidence	$12KspeculativeLoading	$2K to $53KLoading
Jake Blackburn	15.4%	-1.9range -3.1 to -1.1Limited evidence	+0.6range +0.5 to +0.7Limited evidence	$5KspeculativeLoading	$1K to $20KLoading
Jayden Kelsey	2.2%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$2Kspeculative, floor onlyLoading	$1K to $6KLoading
Nevin Ibroci	2.2%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$2Kspeculative, floor onlyLoading	$1K to $6KLoading

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Team pool and per-player compensation · 2025–26β

Team Pool: $220K; 80% Range $82K to $610K
Tier: Low and other; low evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $210K to $230K; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 11; 2 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Jeremiah Quigley	90.3%	$26K	$2K to $105K	17.4%	$24K to $27K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Wes Peterson	79.2%	$10K	$1K to $54K	8.0%	$10K to $11K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jackson Benigni	72.9%	$32K	$2K to $145K	15.7%	$30K to $34K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Bryson Wilson	67.6%	$10K	$1K to $50K	7.8%	$10K to $11K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Zyier Beverly	56.2%	$19K	$2K to $84K	11.1%	$18K to $20K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Ryan Richardson	39.9%	$8K	$1K to $36K	6.0%	$7K to $8K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Stephan Snagg	39.8%	$27K	$4K to $155K	10.3%	$25K to $28K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Demetrius Lilley	34.4%	$12K	$2K to $53K	7.2%	$12K to $13K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jake Blackburn	15.4%	$5K	$1K to $20K	3.4%	$5K to $6K	$2K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jayden Kelsey	2.2%	$2K	$1K to $6K	0.9%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Nevin Ibroci	2.2%	$2K	$1K to $6K	0.9%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool	—	$220K	$82K to $610K	100%	$210K to $230K	—

What-if calculator on the team page

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Binghamton University (NCAA Division I without football)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$2,437,431	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$2,437,431
Athletics department expenses	$23,878,345
Athletics department revenue	$26,999,763

Coverage and exclusions

24 of 27 games passed lineup acceptance (89%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

3 of 27 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (alternate pairing to repo season 2026; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses

Reported revenue	$2,437,431	Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses	$2,437,431	Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest days	Games
First game (no rest value)	1
1 day	1
2 days	5
3 or more days	20

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days	1.3
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent	2
Longest run of consecutive away games	3

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology