Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Auburn

2026 · descriptive season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for Auburn, 2026: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Tahaad Pettiford80.7%+3.6range +2.4 to +4.6Sufficient evidence+7.8range +6.9 to +8.5Sufficient evidenceNot publishedNot published
Keyshawn Hall79.9%+2.4range +1.1 to +3.6Sufficient evidence+7.1range +6.2 to +7.8Sufficient evidenceNot publishedNot published
Kevin Overton78.9%+2.9range +1.7 to +4.2Sufficient evidence+7.3range +6.3 to +8.1Sufficient evidenceNot publishedNot published
Sebastian Williams-Adams67.8%+0.8range -0.6 to +2.1Sufficient evidence+5.2range +4.6 to +5.9Sufficient evidenceNot publishedNot published
Elyjah Freeman66.2%+2.3range +0.8 to +3.7Sufficient evidence+5.8range +5.1 to +6.6Sufficient evidenceNot publishedNot published
KeShawn Murphy49.7%+2.4range +1.1 to +3.7Sufficient evidence+4.4range +3.9 to +5.0Sufficient evidenceNot publishedNot published
Filip Jovic43.4%+1.1range -0.1 to +2.3Sufficient evidence+3.5range +2.9 to +3.9Sufficient evidenceNot publishedNot published
Kaden Magwood13.5%+0.1range -0.8 to +1.0Sufficient evidence+1.0range +0.8 to +1.1Sufficient evidenceNot publishedNot published
Blake Muschalek9.4%-0.9range -1.8 to +0.2Limited evidence+0.6range +0.5 to +0.7Limited evidenceNot publishedNot published
Simon Walker3.9%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNot publishedNot published
Emeka Opurum3.1%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNot publishedNot published
Abdullahi Bashir2.8%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNot publishedNot published
CJ Williams0.3%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNot publishedNot published
Reed Trapp0.3%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNot publishedNot published
Drake Cardwell0.2%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNot publishedNot published

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

36 of 38 games passed lineup acceptance (95%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 2 of 38 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (alternate pairing to repo season 2026; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expenses

Reported revenue$26,568,984Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses$20,535,097Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
1 day3
3 or more days34

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.3
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent1
Longest run of consecutive away games2

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology