Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Tarleton St

2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for Tarleton St, 2025: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Bubu Benjamin91.0%-2.5range -3.6 to -1.4Sufficient evidence+1.9range +1.4 to +2.4Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Izzy Miles72.4%-2.1range -3.1 to -0.9Sufficient evidence+1.7range +1.3 to +2.1Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jordan Mizell58.4%-1.2range -2.8 to +0.3Sufficient evidence+1.6range +1.2 to +2.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Chris Mpaka51.1%-0.5range -1.5 to +0.7Sufficient evidence+1.6range +1.3 to +1.9Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Dantwan Grimes50.1%+0.2range -0.7 to +0.9Sufficient evidence+1.7range +1.4 to +2.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Keitenn Bristow48.2%+0.6range -0.9 to +2.0Sufficient evidence+1.7range +1.4 to +2.1Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Nick Krass40.0%-5.2range -6.8 to -3.6Sufficient evidence+0.4range +0.0 to +0.7Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Joseph Martinez21.0%-2.6range -3.5 to -1.5Sufficient evidence+0.5range +0.4 to +0.6Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Freddy Hicks15.2%+1.6range +0.7 to +2.5Limited evidence+0.6range +0.6 to +0.7Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Ronnie Harrison13.7%-1.8range -2.6 to -0.9Limited evidence+0.4range +0.3 to +0.4Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Marty Silvera11.8%-0.7range -1.2 to -0.2Limited evidence+0.4range +0.3 to +0.4Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Karim Elgizawy10.7%-3.2range -4.1 to -2.2Limited evidence+0.2range +0.1 to +0.3Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Matt Krass9.6%-3.2range -4.0 to -2.3Limited evidence+0.2range +0.1 to +0.3Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Roy Marom3.5%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Caleb Evans3.3%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Collin Course0.0%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

29 of 29 games passed lineup acceptance (100%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

No exclusions were recorded.

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses

Reported revenue$2,613,774Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses$2,613,774Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
1 day2
2 days7
3 or more days19

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.2
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent1
Longest run of consecutive away games3

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology