Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Utah Tech

2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for Utah Tech, 2025: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Noa Gonsalves87.5%-1.9range -2.8 to -0.7Sufficient evidence+2.4range +2.0 to +3.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Hakim Byrd79.5%-3.1range -4.0 to -2.3Sufficient evidence+1.7range +1.2 to +2.2Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Beon Riley67.1%+0.5range -0.2 to +1.2Sufficient evidence+2.7range +2.4 to +3.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Justin Bieker61.9%-1.8range -3.0 to -0.7Sufficient evidence+1.8range +1.4 to +2.2Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Samuel Ariyibi53.5%-1.0range -2.3 to +0.3Sufficient evidence+1.8range +1.4 to +2.2Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Madiba Owona37.4%-1.1range -2.1 to -0.1Sufficient evidence+1.2range +1.1 to +1.5Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Tennessee Rainwater35.2%-4.0range -5.4 to -2.5Sufficient evidence+0.6range +0.3 to +1.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Stone Hutchings16.2%+0.1range -0.8 to +1.1Sufficient evidence+0.7range +0.6 to +0.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Pavle Misic13.1%-0.2range -1.6 to +1.1Limited evidence+0.5range +0.4 to +0.6Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Britton Berrett12.9%-0.5range -1.2 to +0.4Limited evidence+0.5range +0.4 to +0.6Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Unisa Turay12.3%-2.0range -2.8 to -1.2Limited evidence+0.4range +0.3 to +0.4Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Hunter Schenck8.5%-1.5range -2.2 to -0.8Limited evidence+0.3range +0.2 to +0.3Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Sammy Howlin7.7%-0.8range -1.4 to -0.0Limited evidence+0.3range +0.2 to +0.3Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Dallin Grant7.3%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

28 of 31 games passed lineup acceptance (90%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 3 of 31 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expenses

Reported revenue$1,909,142Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses$1,894,269Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
1 day3
2 days8
3 or more days19

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.5
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent2
Longest run of consecutive away games3

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology