Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Yale

2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for Yale, 2025: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Bez Mbeng83.1%+4.1range +3.2 to +5.0Sufficient evidence+5.4range +4.8 to +6.1Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Nick Townsend77.4%+3.1range +2.1 to +4.3Sufficient evidence+4.5range +3.9 to +5.2Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
John Poulakidas74.8%+3.5range +2.3 to +4.6Sufficient evidence+4.6range +4.0 to +5.3Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Casey Simmons62.1%+1.4range +0.2 to +2.6Sufficient evidence+2.9range +2.5 to +3.5Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Samson Aletan53.2%+3.2range +2.4 to +3.9Sufficient evidence+3.0range +2.7 to +3.4Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Isaac Celiscar50.4%+2.3range +1.1 to +3.3Sufficient evidence+2.6range +2.2 to +3.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Trevor Mullin26.9%+1.3range +0.2 to +2.3Sufficient evidence+1.2range +1.0 to +1.4Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jack Molloy17.1%-0.3range -1.3 to +0.7Limited evidence+0.6range +0.5 to +0.7Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Riley Fox16.7%-0.5range -1.4 to +0.4Limited evidence+0.6range +0.5 to +0.7Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jordan Brathwaite14.4%+1.4range +0.5 to +2.0Limited evidence+0.6range +0.5 to +0.7Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Yassine Gharram12.5%+0.1range -0.8 to +1.0Limited evidence+0.4range +0.4 to +0.5Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Devon Arlington5.8%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Teo Rice3.7%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Jeannot Basima1.7%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Emir Buyukhanli0.2%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

25 of 29 games passed lineup acceptance (86%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 4 of 29 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses

Reported revenue$2,101,646Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses$2,101,646Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
1 day7
2 days1
3 or more days20

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.2
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent0
Longest run of consecutive away games4

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology