Wyoming
2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results
Roster valuesβ
| Player | Possession share | Net and range | Wins above replacement and range | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Obi Agbim | 72.6% | -0.5range -1.8 to +0.8Sufficient evidence | +2.6range +2.2 to +3.3Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Jordan Nesbitt | 72.3% | -0.8range -2.1 to +0.7Sufficient evidence | +2.5range +1.9 to +3.2Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Dontaie Allen | 63.6% | +0.3range -0.6 to +1.5Sufficient evidence | +2.6range +2.2 to +3.1Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Kobe Newton | 53.9% | -0.8range -2.3 to +0.6Sufficient evidence | +1.9range +1.5 to +2.4Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Cole Henry | 47.7% | +0.4range -0.9 to +1.5Sufficient evidence | +2.0range +1.6 to +2.5Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| A.J. Wills | 43.1% | -2.2range -3.3 to -1.2Sufficient evidence | +1.2range +0.9 to +1.5Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Touko Tainamo | 40.3% | -0.4range -1.6 to +0.9Sufficient evidence | +1.5range +1.2 to +1.9Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Matija Belic | 39.9% | -3.4range -4.5 to -2.2Sufficient evidence | +0.9range +0.5 to +1.2Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Abou Magassa | 33.7% | +0.2range -0.9 to +1.1Sufficient evidence | +1.4range +1.2 to +1.6Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Oleg Kojenets | 15.2% | -1.8range -2.6 to -1.1Limited evidence | +0.5range +0.4 to +0.6Limited evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Scottie Ebube | 14.4% | -0.9range -1.5 to -0.5Limited evidence | +0.5range +0.4 to +0.6Limited evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Nigle Cook | 1.8% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Cort Roberson | 1.1% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Levi Brown | 0.5% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.
Coverage and exclusions
21 of 31 games passed lineup acceptance (68%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.
- 10 of 31 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team
Program revenueβ
EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses
| Reported revenue | $4,349,840 | Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output. |
|---|---|---|
| Reported expenses | $4,349,840 | Reported by the school. |
EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.
No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.
Schedule loadβ
Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.
Rest days before each game
| Rest days | Games |
|---|---|
| First game (no rest value) | 1 |
| 1 day | 1 |
| 3 or more days | 29 |
Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.
Load summary
| Mean games in prior 7 days | 1.5 |
|---|---|
| Games with fewer rest days than the opponent | 0 |
| Longest run of consecutive away games | 2 |
Association between rest and margin, all teams
Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41
This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.
Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology