Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Wofford

2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for Wofford, 2025: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Corey Tripp72.3%+2.3range +0.9 to +3.7Sufficient evidence+4.8range +4.2 to +5.6Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Dillon Bailey70.9%+1.0range -0.2 to +2.4Sufficient evidence+4.1range +3.4 to +4.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Kyler Filewich69.1%+1.8range +0.7 to +3.2Sufficient evidence+4.4range +3.7 to +5.2Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Justin Bailey67.0%+1.3range -0.3 to +2.6Sufficient evidence+4.0range +3.2 to +4.7Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jeremy Lorenz52.8%+2.7range +1.1 to +4.1Sufficient evidence+3.7range +3.1 to +4.3Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jackson Sivills52.5%+1.1range -0.2 to +2.4Sufficient evidence+3.1range +2.5 to +3.7Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Luke Flynn48.8%+0.6range -0.5 to +1.7Sufficient evidence+2.7range +2.2 to +3.2Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Anthony Arrington, Jr.29.0%-0.9range -2.2 to +0.6Sufficient evidence+1.3range +0.9 to +1.7Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Kahmare Holmes27.2%-1.2range -2.3 to +0.2Sufficient evidence+1.1range +0.9 to +1.5Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Belal El Shakery5.1%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Cannon Richards4.8%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Don Douglass0.4%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

28 of 33 games passed lineup acceptance (85%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 5 of 33 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses

Reported revenue$2,442,245Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses$2,442,245Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
1 day4
2 days2
3 or more days26

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.5
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent2
Longest run of consecutive away games3

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology