Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Winthrop

2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for Winthrop, 2025: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Kasen Harrison76.6%+1.9range +0.8 to +3.1Sufficient evidence+4.8range +4.1 to +5.5Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Kelton Talford71.4%+2.3range +1.0 to +3.3Sufficient evidence+4.6range +3.9 to +5.4Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Nick Johnson69.9%-0.9range -2.3 to +0.9Sufficient evidence+3.0range +2.2 to +4.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
K.J. Doucet63.2%+1.3range +0.2 to +2.3Sufficient evidence+3.6range +3.0 to +4.2Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Bryce Baker49.6%+1.1range -0.6 to +2.5Sufficient evidence+2.8range +2.2 to +3.4Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Paul Jones III47.8%-0.1range -1.5 to +1.1Sufficient evidence+2.3range +1.8 to +2.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Tommy Kamarad31.2%+1.3range +0.1 to +2.6Sufficient evidence+1.8range +1.5 to +2.1Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Isaiah Wilson26.8%-1.4range -2.8 to -0.1Sufficient evidence+1.0range +0.8 to +1.3Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Ryan Jolly21.3%-1.1range -2.2 to -0.1Sufficient evidence+0.9range +0.7 to +1.1Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Logan Duncomb15.3%-0.2range -1.2 to +0.7Sufficient evidence+0.7range +0.6 to +0.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Tai Hamilton13.6%-1.8range -2.8 to -0.6Sufficient evidence+0.5range +0.4 to +0.6Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Yoro Diallo11.1%-2.2range -3.1 to -1.3Limited evidence+0.4range +0.3 to +0.5Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Noah Van Bibber1.4%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Cam Christy0.3%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Henry Harrison0.3%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

30 of 31 games passed lineup acceptance (97%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 1 of 31 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses

Reported revenue$1,944,015Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses$1,944,015Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
1 day4
2 days3
3 or more days23

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.5
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent2
Longest run of consecutive away games2

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology