Wichita St
2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results
Roster valuesβ
| Player | Possession share | Net and range | Wins above replacement and range | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xavier Bell | 67.6% | -0.3range -1.6 to +0.9Sufficient evidence | +3.4range +2.7 to +4.2Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Corey Washington | 66.8% | +1.7range +0.5 to +2.8Sufficient evidence | +4.3range +3.7 to +5.0Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Quincy Ballard | 66.0% | +3.5range +2.3 to +4.8Sufficient evidence | +5.1range +4.4 to +5.9Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Harlond Beverly | 65.6% | +0.8range -0.8 to +2.1Sufficient evidence | +3.8range +3.0 to +4.6Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Bijan Cortes | 56.6% | -0.6range -2.1 to +0.8Sufficient evidence | +2.7range +2.1 to +3.4Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Justin Hill | 53.4% | +0.1range -1.3 to +1.3Sufficient evidence | +2.8range +2.2 to +3.5Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Ronnie DeGray III | 40.4% | +2.2range +0.5 to +3.6Sufficient evidence | +2.8range +2.3 to +3.3Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Matej Bosnjak | 35.6% | -0.9range -2.2 to +0.4Sufficient evidence | +1.6range +1.3 to +2.1Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| AJ McGinnis | 35.4% | -1.4range -2.5 to -0.3Sufficient evidence | +1.5range +1.2 to +1.8Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Joy Ighovodja | 6.4% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Zion Pipkin | 4.4% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Yanis Bamba | 0.9% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Henry Thengvall | 0.6% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.
Coverage and exclusions
31 of 32 games passed lineup acceptance (97%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.
- 1 of 32 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team
Program revenueβ
EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses
| Reported revenue | $6,755,672 | Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output. |
|---|---|---|
| Reported expenses | $6,755,672 | Reported by the school. |
EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.
No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.
Schedule loadβ
Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.
Rest days before each game
| Rest days | Games |
|---|---|
| First game (no rest value) | 1 |
| 1 day | 2 |
| 3 or more days | 29 |
Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.
Load summary
| Mean games in prior 7 days | 1.3 |
|---|---|
| Games with fewer rest days than the opponent | 1 |
| Longest run of consecutive away games | 2 |
Association between rest and margin, all teams
Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41
This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.
Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology