Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Virginia

2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for Virginia, 2025: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Isaac McKneely87.0%+1.0range +0.1 to +1.7Sufficient evidence+4.2range +3.7 to +4.7Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Andrew Rohde75.1%+0.1range -0.9 to +1.1Sufficient evidence+3.2range +2.7 to +3.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Dai Dai Ames65.9%+1.3range +0.1 to +2.4Sufficient evidence+3.3range +2.8 to +3.9Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Elijah Saunders62.6%+0.6range -0.6 to +1.9Sufficient evidence+2.9range +2.4 to +3.5Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Blake Buchanan54.5%+0.1range -0.9 to +1.0Sufficient evidence+2.4range +2.0 to +2.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jacob Cofie51.5%+1.0range -0.0 to +2.0Sufficient evidence+2.5range +2.2 to +2.9Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Taine Murray42.8%-0.9range -1.9 to -0.1Sufficient evidence+1.6range +1.4 to +1.9Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Ishan Sharma26.2%+1.2range -0.1 to +2.5Sufficient evidence+1.3range +1.1 to +1.6Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Anthony Robinson18.0%+1.3range +0.2 to +2.4Sufficient evidence+0.9range +0.8 to +1.1Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
TJ Power15.4%-1.0range -2.1 to +0.1Limited evidence+0.6range +0.5 to +0.7Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Desmond Roberts0.5%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Bryce Walker0.4%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Eli Bennett0.1%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

27 of 32 games passed lineup acceptance (84%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 5 of 32 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expenses

Reported revenue$17,841,957Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses$16,646,407Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
1 day1
2 days2
3 or more days28

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.4
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent0
Longest run of consecutive away games2

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology