Villanova
2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results
Roster valuesβ
| Player | Possession share | Net and range | Wins above replacement and range | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jordan Longino | 87.2% | -0.4range -1.5 to +0.6Sufficient evidence | +3.8range +3.1 to +4.6Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Eric Dixon | 84.1% | +2.5range +1.7 to +3.3Sufficient evidence | +5.3range +4.6 to +6.0Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Wooga Poplar | 80.5% | +1.4range +0.5 to +2.3Sufficient evidence | +4.5range +3.8 to +5.2Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Jhamir Brickus | 74.3% | +0.7range -0.4 to +1.9Sufficient evidence | +3.8range +3.2 to +4.6Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Tyler Perkins | 64.1% | +3.6range +2.2 to +4.9Sufficient evidence | +4.5range +3.9 to +5.1Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Enoch Boakye | 57.1% | +2.8range +1.5 to +4.3Sufficient evidence | +3.7range +3.1 to +4.4Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Josiah Moseley | 21.1% | -0.1range -1.3 to +1.2Sufficient evidence | +0.9range +0.8 to +1.2Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Kris Parker | 16.2% | -0.9range -1.9 to +0.1Limited evidence | +0.6range +0.5 to +0.8Limited evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Jordann Dumont | 9.3% | +1.8range +1.0 to +2.9Limited evidence | +0.5range +0.5 to +0.6Limited evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Nnanna Njoku | 5.9% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Collin O'Toole | 0.2% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.
Coverage and exclusions
27 of 33 games passed lineup acceptance (82%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.
- 6 of 33 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team
Program revenueβ
EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expenses
| Reported revenue | $16,554,290 | Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output. |
|---|---|---|
| Reported expenses | $15,910,105 | Reported by the school. |
EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.
No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.
Schedule loadβ
Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.
Rest days before each game
| Rest days | Games |
|---|---|
| First game (no rest value) | 1 |
| 1 day | 1 |
| 2 days | 2 |
| 3 or more days | 29 |
Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.
Load summary
| Mean games in prior 7 days | 1.3 |
|---|---|
| Games with fewer rest days than the opponent | 2 |
| Longest run of consecutive away games | 2 |
Association between rest and margin, all teams
Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41
This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.
Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology