Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Utah

2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for Utah, 2025: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Gabe Madsen74.9%+0.2range -1.0 to +1.3Sufficient evidence+3.3range +2.6 to +4.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jake Wahlin58.8%+0.3range -0.9 to +1.8Sufficient evidence+2.6range +2.1 to +3.2Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Mike Sharavjamts56.2%+1.8range +0.7 to +3.2Sufficient evidence+3.0range +2.6 to +3.6Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Ezra Ausar55.8%+2.0range +0.6 to +3.4Sufficient evidence+3.0range +2.6 to +3.6Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Lawson Lovering55.1%+2.3range +1.0 to +3.4Sufficient evidence+3.1range +2.7 to +3.6Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Hunter Erickson44.5%+0.4range -1.2 to +2.0Sufficient evidence+2.0range +1.6 to +2.5Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Miro Little41.9%+1.0range +0.0 to +2.2Sufficient evidence+2.1range +1.8 to +2.4Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Keanu Dawes39.5%+0.1range -1.3 to +1.6Sufficient evidence+1.7range +1.4 to +2.2Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Mason Madsen31.7%+1.1range -0.3 to +2.4Sufficient evidence+1.6range +1.3 to +1.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Zach Keller19.8%+0.4range -0.7 to +1.6Sufficient evidence+0.9range +0.7 to +1.1Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Caleb Lohner18.3%+0.1range -1.0 to +1.2Sufficient evidence+0.8range +0.7 to +0.9Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Joul Karram1.4%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Jerry Huang0.7%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Brady Smith0.7%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Ayomide Bamisile0.5%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

28 of 32 games passed lineup acceptance (88%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 4 of 32 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expenses

Reported revenue$16,981,671Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses$8,954,515Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
2 days1
3 or more days30

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.4
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent0
Longest run of consecutive away games2

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology