Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

UT San Antonio

2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for UT San Antonio, 2025: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Marcus Millender89.2%+1.1range +0.3 to +1.8Sufficient evidence+4.4range +4.0 to +5.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Primo Spears88.7%+0.1range -0.7 to +1.1Sufficient evidence+3.9range +3.4 to +4.5Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Raekwon Horton71.4%+1.2range +0.3 to +2.1Sufficient evidence+3.6range +3.2 to +4.1Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Damari Monsanto67.4%+0.2range -1.4 to +1.7Sufficient evidence+3.1range +2.4 to +3.7Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jonnivius Smith55.5%+0.6range -0.3 to +1.5Sufficient evidence+2.7range +2.3 to +3.1Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Tai'Reon Joseph35.2%-2.1range -2.8 to -1.3Sufficient evidence+1.1range +0.9 to +1.4Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Baboucarr Njie27.7%+0.0range -0.9 to +0.8Sufficient evidence+1.3range +1.1 to +1.5Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
David Hermes27.0%-0.9range -1.6 to -0.2Sufficient evidence+1.1range +0.9 to +1.3Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Mo Njie10.4%-0.4range -1.2 to +0.3Limited evidence+0.4range +0.4 to +0.5Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Nazar Mahmoud8.7%-2.1range -2.9 to -1.4Limited evidence+0.3range +0.2 to +0.3Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jaquan Scott8.2%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Skylar Wicks8.1%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Paul Lewis1.2%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Zach Gonsoulin0.5%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
LJ Brown0.2%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Jackson Fazande0.2%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

25 of 29 games passed lineup acceptance (86%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 4 of 29 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses

Reported revenue$2,897,731Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses$2,897,731Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
2 days3
3 or more days25

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.4
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent0
Longest run of consecutive away games3

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology