Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

UNC Asheville

2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for UNC Asheville, 2025: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Toyaz Solomon78.8%+1.6range +0.5 to +2.7Sufficient evidence+4.1range +3.6 to +4.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Josh Banks77.6%+0.7range -0.6 to +1.9Sufficient evidence+3.7range +3.0 to +4.4Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jordan Marsh75.7%+0.1range -1.1 to +1.3Sufficient evidence+3.3range +2.7 to +4.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Fletcher Abee75.6%+0.4range -0.8 to +1.7Sufficient evidence+3.5range +2.8 to +4.2Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Greg Gantt Jr.72.0%+0.6range -0.6 to +1.7Sufficient evidence+3.4range +2.8 to +4.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Kameron Taylor50.8%+0.4range -0.8 to +1.4Sufficient evidence+2.3range +2.0 to +2.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jemal Davis31.8%-0.8range -1.9 to +0.5Sufficient evidence+1.2range +1.0 to +1.5Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Connor Dubsky16.9%-1.4range -2.4 to -0.4Sufficient evidence+0.6range +0.5 to +0.7Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Julian Clarke7.4%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Sage Tolentino5.8%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Aidan Rubio5.1%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Javoy Thompson2.3%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Corey Jones0.2%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

26 of 28 games passed lineup acceptance (93%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 2 of 28 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses

Reported revenue$1,472,812Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses$1,472,812Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
1 day1
2 days4
3 or more days22

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.3
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent4
Longest run of consecutive away games3

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology